OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
75167846 over 6 years ago

Kun je ook aangeven hoe de wegen die parkeergarage binnenkomen?
En misschien kun je op het forum meepraten/denken over de situatie?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=67571
Ik mis nu nog de informatie oop de kaart dat het een parkeergarage is. Zit er nog meer in dat gebouw?

74500345 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74541047 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74500332 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74500297 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74540347 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74542303 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74500185 over 6 years ago

Wat betekent kmjbg?
Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74579890 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74580428 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

74541330 over 6 years ago

Verzoek aan jlov3001: Graag wat meer "changeset comments" toevoegen volgens deze regels:
osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

71615034 over 6 years ago

I don't think there is a key (yet) to describe this situation well. Could you post your question in the German Forum?
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14

Your solution is not bad in this case, but because you are the only one using it, we maybe should search for a solution that fits a broader use.

71615034 over 6 years ago

Is there a visible separation between the two?
How can bicycle riders see that there is a part of the road not meant for them but to be used as a footway?

73623790 over 6 years ago

This is (v2)

73066509 over 6 years ago

Thanks for fixing this quickly!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

73066676 over 6 years ago

Thanks for fixing this quickly!

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

71615034 over 6 years ago

Hi,
What exactly is "cycleway:width=2" telling me more than "width=2".
See here:
way/698118124#map=17/53.23745/10.44000

where you use this key on a designated cycleway.

highway=path
width=2
bicycle=designated

is enough to describe it.
You are the only person using this key.
When you invent a new key, shouldn't you not also create a wiki page to describe it's function/meaning/use?

69733371 over 6 years ago

napo, you're right, it wasn't you. Sorry.
Anyway, it's fixed now! :)

72626360 over 6 years ago

You can see from the aerial pictures that this area is in development, and probably all of it will be landuse=residential, but for now the greater part of this area should be tagged like so:
landuse=construction
construction=residential
And only the small part where the houses are, can be tagged as residential. Once the area is no longer "under construction", you can remove the construction=residential and change the landuse key to its proper value.
Read the wiki:
landuse=construction

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

64844647 over 6 years ago

Hi palimpadum,
You have used natural=taxiway for this object:
way/648460304
But a taxiway can hardly be considered something "natural". You must have meant something different, but what?
Regards,
Marc.