I have changed this area to natural=scrub as the tags being used before cannot be used togehter! If something is fell it means vegatation above the tree-line and hence it cannot be a forest!

He cambiado esta área a natural = scrub ya que las etiquetas que se usan antes no se pueden usar juntas. Si algo se natural=fell, significa vegetación por encima de la línea de árboles y, por lo tanto, no puede ser landuse=forest.

This is (v2)

I found about 2500+ highway=milestone markers in this region that were not connected to the highway itself. Making them useless because the routing software cannot read them. Also the use of the pk=* is not relevant anymore.
(google translate):
Encontré aproximadamente 2500 marcadores de highway=milestone en esta región que no estaban conectados a la carretera en sí. Haciéndolos inútiles porque el software de enrutamiento no puede leerlos. Además, el uso de pk=* ya no es relevante.

That is because not all mappers do understand changeset comments. If some mapper was just editing a (single) highway in Cuevas del Campo he still could see what I did. This is especially helpfull for new mappers. BTW, I also did change the UPPERcase streetnames in Pozo Alcon.
It was my intention to remove those notes withinn some weeks anyway. Feel free yourself to do that!

Dag Andre,
Je hebt een fietspad in deze changeset de surface=grind meegegeven. Weet je ook een bruikbare Engelse term daarvoor? Is gravel dan niet beter?
Zie ook:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=65660
(item #4)

This is (v4a), not (v4)

Yecla I meant.

Villena I meant!

Not in Yecla but in Villena I meant!

Hi kapazo,
I have sent you a personal message by OSM mail about this road:
way/101518845
To me that is an unclassified road, it now is residential.

I have solved this problem.

Thanks kapazo for your comment.
Yes, I know the difficulties with the tracktype. I'm very often in Spain (riding bicycle and collecting a lot of mapillary images too, mostly on tracks) and will be in the Granada region again in May this year.
Most of the time tracktype 2 is more correct than no tracktype at all which (especially for bicycleriders) gives the impression (in the rendering) of a paved road.
See the images at mapillary:
https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=38.7239222222222&lng=-2.4788222222222203&z=14.040240880456068&pKey=xudzPQIq7uAWm4u7WcVXFQ&focus=photo
Although in this case the tracktype is not given (it's tagged as cycleway;surface=compacted) this would be a clear candidate for tracktype2

The name of a city/town/village/hamlet should NOT be put on the landuse=residential. We use the place=* tagging to give a place its name!

El nombre de una "city/town/village/hamlet" NO se debe poner en el uso de la landuse=residential. Usamos el "place=*" etiquetado para dar a un lugar su nombre!

No veo agua en el embalse en fotos aéreas recientes. Sin embargo, he puesto access = no en las carreteras dentro del embalse.

I don't see any water in the embalse on recent aerial pictures. Nevertheless I have put access=no on the roads inside the embalse.

From the wiki:
Most landuse=residential objects in OSM are nameless, simply indicating general areas used for residences. However, housing estates and other specific residential areas are also often given their own landuse=residential area plus the correct name=*. "name" in that context is the name of the quarter or district like "Sendling" Munich. Do not use the name of the city or village as name.

In this changeset I changed the fixme text so that it didn't contain a reference to the pk tag, which is absent from this milestone.

La "highway=milestone" tag debe estar conectada a la propia carretera. He añadido un "fixme" para explicar eso.
¡Yo reparé algunas, pero es demasiado trabajo hacerlas todas!
Además, "pk=*" ya no es compatible y debería (podría) eliminarse.

See:
landuse=residential

Please note: suburbs shouldn't use the principal name of the city they belong to on their name=* tag (if any).
See: landuse=residential

Not around Nerpio but around Las Anorias.