Thanks!

Hi, I see you have marked Gillingham Cemetery as disused. I don't believe that to be true. Could I ask you to check please, and update if necessary? Thanks.

Yes, I agree. It isn't a public right of way and I don't recollect any indication of permitted access, so it can be marked as private.

Hi, is this really Field Closes? Looks like a spelling mistake!

Martin Hibbert

https://www.keepright.at/report_map.php?schema=87&error=80533994 suggests the tag might be wrong.

In any case the only reference to post_box:design in the Wiki is a Russian page.

Could you check this out please? If valid, could you update the Wiki?

Thanks

Done. Still not really quite right though, as access=no means there is no LEGAL right of access, whereas in this case the legal right remains but you can't physically access it.

Hi Mike,
This is a legal public footpath (foot=designated) but it is blocked at the stream because there is no bridge (node/5127826625) and there is also no stile over the fence on the west side of the stream (node/4724899564). With the agreement of the farmer we have established a permissive path (way/479375521) to provide an alternative route. Happy to retag this if you can suggest an alternative.

Regards
Martin Hibbert

What you have added to the map is nonsense. way/456769614 does not represent a real feature on the ground. I have deleted it. You are causing damage. Please STOP.

Hi, you are duplicating many existing streets e.g. way/456771026. Please consider very carefully what you are doing and now take the time to repair what you have done. Thank you

I've no idea why I tagged them as 'building=hpu'. The one you quote is definitely a house (in fact it was the house that Sir Anthony Eden lived in before his death in 1977). The others are probably houses but I've tagged them as 'building=yes' for now & will update them the next time I walk that way.

Hi, I think you probably added the leisure=park node/4257351241 by mistake, especially since it is now in the middle of a highway. Could you correct this please?

I changed amenity=bar to amenity=pub, also corrected the name of the pub (Rose & Crown). It is a pub, but the name is not 'Pub'.

Congratulations on your first contribution to OSM. Unfortunately all you've done is to draw a line over some existing roads and paths and given it a name, which doesn't add anything to the map. Perhaps you saved it by mistake? In any case I recommend deleting it and starting again. Let me know if you need help.

I'm trying to resolve a JOSM validation issue with way/260578364 which was originally imported in this changeset.
It is showing 'boundary type administrative - unclosed way. I'm guessing is that this is because it is not now a member of any relation, and that probably that membership has been deleted. Would you be able to help identify the correct relation?

Many thanks...Martin Hibbert

Thank you

The Quevedo ring road (Anillo Vial Quevedo), which includes this cloverleaf, was officially opened on January 5 2016. See this article http://www.eluniverso.com/noticias/2016/01/04/nota/5325367/anillo-vial-quevedo-se-inaugura-manana

What makes you think the cloverleaf is "obviously incorrect"? The Bing imagery is dated 2011. Have you taken the trouble to discuss with the original mapper before deleting his work? Try taking a look at Google maps of Quevedo and you will see that the cloverleaf is present. Obviously you cannot trace from Google maps; you now need to get your deletion reverted.

Hi, you appear to have tagged Hazeldean B&B both as a house and separately as a hotel. I don't think that can be correct, could you take another look please?

Changed building=kindergarten to amenity=kindergarten. See amenity=kindergarten

I see you have added Dr John Garang International School as "building=kindergarten". I think this should be "amenity=kindergarten" since it encloses a number of buildings. Could you look at it again please?