Thanks :)

(Imagery used was Bing imagery aligned to OSMUK Cadastral Parcels)

Thanks for adding these! For future reference, local names can be put in the loc_name tag name=* (via the Tags section in the editor)

Thanks :)

Thanks :)

Hi both, Looks like an error as I checked yesterday and its still on the former RBS building, not NatWest. I've deleted the duplicate :)

Would this info be better on the relation (relation/5982501), as it applies to the school as a whole (both the senior and prep school campuses) rather than just the senior school site?

The fixed BBQ was removed some years ago. Deleted in changeset/119535899

Hi, are you sure this is correct? Last time I visited it seemed to be a public road with no "private" signage, and it's recorded as part of the public highway network on https://cumbria.highway-iams.uk/Live/PBLC/PIP/?cg=networks I guess it does look a bit like a driveway though as it goes through a gateway.

Looks like this was added in an earlier changeset, and the mapper likely intended to use heritage=2 (see listed_status=*#England) I've fixed this in changeset/115338619 Merry Christmas!

Thanks! 😄

Hi, Thanks for your edits in the area. Tip: (ignore if you know this already!) If you change the existing from building=terrace to building=house before using the Terracer plugin, it ensures that the newly split buildings will be tagged as houses, rather than a terrace. Also useful to add the addr:street/city/postcode tags beforehand too, as you'll want these on all the buildings, then it's just a case if adding the housenumbers once the terrace has been split. This can all be done in a single changeset. :)

Thanks for your fixes. The bird feeding area has a screen on its west side with gaps in so that people can see the birds whilst being 'hidden', like a bird hide. This 'bird hide' is not covered and is not a building. iD does sometimes complain about tagging, but that doesn't always mean that the existing tagging is incorrect.

I'm not sure about the amphitheatre and sundial (which doesn't need a descriptive name) being inners as this excludes them from being in the park, when they are actually within and part of the park.

I agree with gurglypipe, the only useful change appears to be the fountain at Standen Park. Please revert the errors identified, or even the whole changeset if easier.

Hi, thanks for your edits. We have amenity=kindergarten (amenity=kindergarten) on the boundary outline/grounds, and amenity=childcare (amenity=childcare) on the building itself. Which is more appropriate, as we probably only need to use one tag? And if the tag is on the outline/grounds, then there is no need to for the individual buildings to be tagged with childcare/kindergarten, otherwise we're just duplicating the data. Cheers

Last time I checked all the road signs on the north bound section were white rather than green (changeset/46964940) so can be considered "primary" rather than "trunk" in OSM, as per osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom

Hi, thanks for your edits. The relation was unnecessary so I've deleted it. Hopefully that will stop JOSM complaining :)

Hi, thanks for your edits. The path does appear to be visible on Esri imagery (dated May 2020) and other undated satellite imagery sources. Perhaps a trail_visibility may be appropriate trail_visibility=*

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Arnside. For housenames, please enter this in the Housename field, under the Address section, rather than the generic Name section. Any questions feel free to send me a message through my profile. Happy mapping and hope to see more edits from you soon. :)

I thought they might be. Thanks for fixing so quickly. :-)