Just seen your changeset changeset/156608934

That looks more like it, thanks for fixing.

Hi, in this changeset you've separated - and created a gap between - Caxton House and Orrest Cottage, yet the building are joined together in reality. Is there a reason you made this edit or were you trying to achieve something else? :)

It's a general recreation ground. Not sure if there's any cricket club based there atm, might just be Caton United using it.

Hi, for future reference, please mark closed shops as disused (using the disused: prefix and old_name tag) rather than deleting them. That way, the history is preserved and it's much easier for local mappers to later update to a new use. If you scroll down to the all tags section in the editor, you can change the tagging to (for example) disused:amenity=restaurant and old_name=Capri, keeping the addr tags as they are. :)

Hi, welcome to OSM. Cumbria is no longer a two tier county, following the creation of the two unitary authorities on 1 April 2023. Please see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cumbria#Governance for details. As such, the previous tagging should be restored. Thanks.

Hi, thanks for your recent StreetComplete mapping in Saveley-in-Cartmel. Please note that only signed/commonly used names should use the name tag; reference numbers should use the ref tag. For C and U numbers, as they are usually unsigned in England, please use the official_ref tag. (see osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom#Tagging_road_numbers)

I've fixed the tagging here in changeset/154265634 :)

Hi, if it's a hardcore/sub-base sort of surface at present, the "compacted" option is probably a better fit. Fingers crossed the issues get resolved soon.

I've fixed this in changeset/154034910 :)

Hi, is it correct to include the club name in the stadium/ground name? The name tag should be for the name only. Perhaps the club could be recorded under a different tag.

Hi, please can you just check way/33284352 - looks like some pub tagging has found its way onto a road! :)

Hi, thanks for your recent edits in this area. Please can you just check the postcodes you have added in this changeset (and possibly others) - it should be LA22, not LS22. Thanks :)

Looks good. Lancaster city centre will probably end up being micromapped with all the pavements added, so it will eventually all be joined up! You could just extend it to meet Peter Street for now, add footway=sidewalk, and delete the fixme :)

👍

🏃‍♂️

👍

Hello, thanks for your recent edits around Rydal.

This road should not be tagged as tertiary. It is just an access road for the Hall, church, houses and farmland, and not anything more important. Looking at the Council's highway network map, it is also not part of the public adopted highway network, although it does have a bridleway designation. Tertiary roads tend to be C-class through-route roads, or other key routes which are not A- or B-class (eg the roads through Staveley and Burneside). Please see the tagging guidance at osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom Another local mapper had changed it back to service after your last changeset, and it ought to be changed back again.

Thanks. :)

Cheers, you too 👍

I'd say so, yes. Even the smallest cul-de-sac roads can be tagged as residential.

Perhaps if it was private and didn't have a name, then service would be more appropriate.

Hi, thanks for adding lots of detail around Windermere recently.

I'd say that the lower part of Thwaites Lane is best tagged as residential based on the wiki and local knowledge - there's houses facing it and addressed off it, and it's part of the public highway network. width/lanes/sidewalk tags could be added to indicate its characteristics.

Feel free to drop me a message if there's anything local you want to discuss! :)

@benjo384 Hi, you added the name Dales Way to way/889014234. Have you walked the route and surveyed the waymarking signage? I ask because there is an unresolved map note on it (note/2366584) - does the waymarked route follow this path through the fields and not along the road? Thanks.