I agree with gurglypipe, the only useful change appears to be the fountain at Standen Park. Please revert the errors identified, or even the whole changeset if easier.

Hi, thanks for your edits. We have amenity=kindergarten (amenity=kindergarten) on the boundary outline/grounds, and amenity=childcare (amenity=childcare) on the building itself. Which is more appropriate, as we probably only need to use one tag? And if the tag is on the outline/grounds, then there is no need to for the individual buildings to be tagged with childcare/kindergarten, otherwise we're just duplicating the data. Cheers

Last time I checked all the road signs on the north bound section were white rather than green (changeset/46964940) so can be considered "primary" rather than "trunk" in OSM, as per osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom

Hi, thanks for your edits. The relation was unnecessary so I've deleted it. Hopefully that will stop JOSM complaining :)

Hi, thanks for your edits. The path does appear to be visible on Esri imagery (dated May 2020) and other undated satellite imagery sources. Perhaps a trail_visibility may be appropriate trail_visibility=*

Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Arnside. For housenames, please enter this in the Housename field, under the Address section, rather than the generic Name section. Any questions feel free to send me a message through my profile. Happy mapping and hope to see more edits from you soon. :)

I thought they might be. Thanks for fixing so quickly. :-)

Hello, in this changeset you added 5 water points. Given the car park settings, water points seem unlikely. What did you intend to map?

Hi Milhouse, you've accidentally tagged the whole path as a kissing gate. Please can you fix it? way/262543320

Thanks for fixing :)

Hi, A late welcome to OSM and thanks for all your mapping in Cumbria! Just one thing: when adding new paths, please make sure that they connect to existing paths so that they can be used for routing and navigation. In the iD editor you can drag the end of the path onto the other and they should snap together and show as connected with a grey, rather than white, node/circle. I'm not sure how this is done in GoMap. I've fixed this for you on the path you added to Watch Hill. If you ever have any questions feel free to send to me a message. :)

Hi, Welcome to OSM and thanks for your edits in Shap. There seems to be 2 different spellings: Ralfland (on way/160505402) and Ralphland (on way/867971679) - please can you confirm which is correct? Thanks :)

Hi, please can you make sure that any gates you add are connected to the path that goes through them? In the editor you can drag the gate onto the path and it should snap into place. Thanks :)

Hi, please can you check the tags you have added to nodes such as node/5688084971 and node/5688084972. This may need to be reverted if it's a widespread issue. Thanks :)

I'd agree with removing the highway=* tag. IMO the name "cross bay walk" is also the name of the event or activity (when the guided walks are led) rather than the name of the route itself.

Thanks

(closes note/1532274)

Hi, is there a reason why you removed the access tag? access=private was correct and matched that on way/559785202

Hi, unfortunately this changeset is wrong. There is only one barrier which was already mapped at node/4264452143. Crag Walk is drivable all the way from Helm Road to the bollard linked above. Reverted in 92566848.

Not a problem, thank you for fixing so quickly :-)

Hi, thanks for your contributions. Unfortunately the Esri World Imagery (Clarity) Beta is out of date in this area. Bing is the latest imagery available. Please can you amend your changeset, using Bing imagery? Thanks :)