ah you're refering to Crumlin, i agree with your change in Crumlin it is fine. I was refering to the few junctions you've deleted similar to this one around the A4119. some I agree they didn't represent the junction accurately but others, there was nothing wrong with them, they're only crime was not matching your standard. this is out of context so i'll make another comment on that changeset

No matter where you stand on a roundabout there is always a carriage way heading in the opposite way to your right with a physical barrier separating you so a roundabout fits the definition of a duel carriageway better than a single carriageway with exception of mini roundabouts which i would except are single carriage ways and any road that forms a loop could be considered a so called circular carriageway. So is the M60 a single carriageway by your rules? It also make more common and practical sense. if you set every roundabout to 60 a satnav may start informing a driver that the speed limit has changed every time they end and leave a roundabout which is silly.

If your refer to the one my Llantrisant then I need to double check it but they have be constructing a duel carriage way in that area. It may not be on imergry yet

simply tagging a node is meant to be a faster simpler less detailed method. You should always strive for greater detail on osm as time allows, this is what it means to micromap. you should not go around deleting high detail mapping just because it does not fit your lower standard. this is a smaller example but some of changes you've made to junctions in some of your recent changesets is rather worrysome. please also remember everything you are delete, someone spent time creating.

the definition of a tertiary is "Smaller through roads linking cities, towns or villages, or linking suburbs within built up areas". this is the primary road connecting Trefil to Tredegar and the rest of the road network

Hi there Nathan,
I've noticed you just a few change sets recently altering junctions like this and I don't feel like there is a justification for simplifying junctions like this. it seems like you simply deleting detail for no benefit.

this is incorrect. the road between tredegar and trefil should be tertiary not unclassified
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160145298

this change is incorrect, the roundabout is part of the duel carriage way and should be 70
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160145534

Hello, you appeared to have move the this power pole node/12116009491. I've now fixed it. please be more careful in future.
Kind regards,
Kits.

Reverting as this is the official name of this transformer as supplied by National Grid. The name can often be written on a plate on the transformer but often not. Transformer names very rarely get updated.

changeset/159438290

Hi there Richard, There is no need to add a cross over in the middle of the intersection. It better to keep it a more standard box setup which also avoids needing to use restriction. I've cleaned it up in this changeset changeset/158662440.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158624156

Hi Andy,
I've corrected the small error in bryn bach park. I must have forgot to delete it when moving the cycle path to the footway.
I have been keeping an eye on it as part of keeping the A465 updated between hirwaun and merthyr. I didn't notice the issues further east.

The Hirwaun junction should be complete now. I believe the plans showed the cycle path simply going around the footpath of the roundabouts but would need to survey to be sure.

The missing section by Clwydyfagwyr is still very much missing, this part is prob under the most construction atm.

Where the path deviates at Ebbw Vale, I would say the north path is the correct one as it goes past a new view point that marks the highest point on the A465 next to the layby.

There is a marker sign visible here https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=51.794811104118&lng=-3.2406067041258666&z=17&pKey=828924529172279&x=0.6828198013385215&y=0.5073284517773355&zoom=0.23349817312209759&focus=photo

I will prob survey the cycle path here next chance I get. its only about 10 mins from home.

reverting holy rock as I do not believe there is a holy rock in the middle of this field

changeset/158086862

reverting changeset #156728549 for removing transformers official name without reason

changeset/158085245

Hi there, you should also change sidewalk tag on the road to sidewalk=separate when mapping sidewalk as separate ways.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158062863

Hi there,
There is no need for concern, this is very normal. Your browser is caching the parts of the map, this is normal and used to reduce load on the server. usually you can force a full refresh with Ctrl + Shift + R in most browsers. The cache will also naturally expire over time. You can read more about it here: osm.wiki/Browser_cache
Kind regards,
Kits

Hi there,
It appears you added a duplicate line on top of the existing one by mistake. I've corrected this and replaced it with a track with no motor vehicles allowed.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157684673

Hi there CaseGiffGaff,
Just to let you know I'm in the process of importing 11kv power lines and will be covering this area very soon. To try and avoid too many conflicts I would ask you to avoid adding any more for a while.
osm.wiki/NGED_Import_Project
Thanks,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157504285

Hi,
This change is incorrect, the town is spelt "Fleur-de-lis"
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157433739

Hello Darklot, and welcome to OSM.

although this changeset does not appear malicious overall, it has quite a few bad and dubious changes. In Llanbradoch, you deleted a service road that shouldn't have been deleted and made a bit of a mess out of the landuse=residential area. In Fleur-De-Lis you connected St Deinois Close to St Davids Rd when it shouldn't be. you also added a view point and a named rock to Rhymney river, nether of which I believe exist. For these reasons and the fact you've got a history of adding fictious data, I'll be reverting this changeset. If this is a genuine attempt at making improvements to OSM, I encourage you to make smaller changes to begin with until you get the hang of editing so that your changes can be more selectively critiqued. Please feel free to ask any questions you may have,
Kind regards,
Kits.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157352361