Hello Tapa,
In all your recent changesets you've been adding blank areas instead of buildings. To change this, select an area in the editor then click on "Area" button in the top left and then search for "Building", this will then change the blank area into a generic building. Please note that untagged areas don't get rendered to the map but buildings do. You have also created a few overlapping areas in some places like here: osm.org/edit?editor=id&#map=20/2.6924346/-73.1903277
please fix this before continuing.

Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156838633

Hi RunEveryStreet,
Welcome to OSM. I believe you have made a small mistake here, max height should be added to the road that is affected not to the road on the bridge. I've fixed this now.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156816387

osm.wiki/Why_we_won%27t_delete_roads_on_private_property osm.wiki/Why_can%27t_I_delete_this_trail%3F

Reverted as OSM is built on public information such as imagery as such details can't be removed simply by request.

changeset/156746836

Reverted as OSM is built on public information such as imagery as such details can't be removed simply by request.

changeset/156746836

reverted changesets 156541289, 156541323 due to mass deletion without description and failed to respond to comments.

changeset/156746040

reverted changesets 156541289, 156541323 due to mass deletion without description and failed to respond to comments.

changeset/156746040

I will accept there is a argument for meadows here, I wasn't aware that meadows was also used for hay although I question how well that tagging will work since a farmer may choose grain over hay on a particular year but that's not a conversation for here. As for way/131600335, yes you did not created it but you did change it from landuse=farmland to landuse=grass in this changeset. landuse=grass is not correct here and should be changed.

High there Canalsman,
Just let you know you can make multiple changes for per each changeset. it is good practice to group related changes together into few changesets.
Kind regards,
Kits
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156707943

Hi, I dont think these changes are correct, most of these fields appear to be growing fields from imergery so should be tagged landuse=farmland not meadows. also landuse=grass is used wrong on way/131600335#map=15/51.95377/-3.88672. landuse=grass is used for managed areas of grass like a lawn. from imagery this area appears to be a mix of farmland and meadows.

personally I think there is a enough evidence from imagery that this should be replaced with a mini-roundabout node as there is no physical island as its just painted on.

Hi there, I see you've tagged two way circular junction here. is this correct? should it not be a oneway roundabout?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156522727

Why was this deleted? has it been demolished?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156541289

To clarify, in the UK a trunk road is defined as a road own and operated by the national government rather than the local government. On OSM, a trunk road is defined the highest performance road that is not a motorway. under the UK road classification system this means that a OSM trunk road is a UK primary A-road. with non-primary A-roads being `highway=primary` and B-roads being `highway=secondary`.

hope this clears up the issue.

Yes you are correct it is not a trunk road but it is a "Primary A Road" and Primary A Roads are tagged as trunk roads in OSM. osm.wiki/Roads_in_the_United_Kingdom

reverted due to use of findmystreet.co.uk that uses OS data

changeset/156400898

Hi Krd,
Unfortunately findmystreet uses copyrighted OS data and is incompatible with OSM.

oh i do apologise, i was under the impression you added it. I would prob be a good idea to add a note with #surveyme in it here.

Hi Nathan,
thanks for the info, sorry I didn't get back to you in a while. If that's the case I would recommend adding `traffic_sign:forward=overtaking overtaking=no` to the start and end nodes of the restriction to make this clear. obviously changing `forward` to `backward` for the 2nd node.

Hi gg4om,
way/182828153
This path appears to cut straight though multiple fields.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156320979