OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

kevjs1982's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by kevjs1982

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
983114 kevjs1982

Where does this cycleway end? Crossing at Mapperley Road is pedestrian only and no cycle signs at that end either. Also need to check how the new cycle links on Forest Road East link to north bound Mansfield Road.

904028 kevjs1982

Access to be prohibited between 18:00 and 06:00 for motor vehicles along Broad Street (south of Old Lenton Street) and permanently south of the junction of Carlton Street (just south of there will have a bollard with cycles only - deliveries & access to be from Warser Gate). Due to start 15/03/2017 (TBC) under an 18 month experimental order. Further order for Heathcoat street to follow.

295437 SomeoneElse

way/313357384#map=16/52.8591/-1.3074&layers=N is a railway line allegedly on an embankment that goes under the A50 and M1. It makes sense that it's above the Trent flood plain here but is it really on an embankment?

458563 kevjs1982

Housing being demolished around here.

894670 SK53

Didn't last long http://www.nottinghampost.com/nottingham-s-coast-to-coast-restaurant-closed-with-job-losses/story-30141070-detail/story.html

641287 kevjs1982

Housing being demolished around here - IIRC all the eastern side is now cleared as are parts of Arkwright Street further south.

824970 SK53

Looks to have finally gone: http://www.nottinghampost.com/battle-of-the-dunkirk-is-over-as-landlord-calls-time/story-30001360-detail/story.html

633359 kevjs1982

Is Hound's Gate actually one way? There are no one way signs on Wheeler Gate or Hounds gate, and the Hounds Gate/Spaniel Row junction had both entry and exit markings, and cars certainly treat Hounds Gate as one way. The Wheeler Gate / Friar Lane junction is marked with give way markings exiting Wheeler Gate only though.

839680 SK53

Soon to be Gusto http://www.nottinghampost.com/50-jobs-at-new-west-bridgford-restaurant-gusto-here-s-how-to-get-one/story-30027139-detail/story.html

396706 SomeoneElse

Lots of consituent ways of relation/1387699 also have been given "names" by a newbie mapper. I'm guessing that this is not correct, and really they're just part of a relation with that name. Perhaps a local could check?