I've reverted this changeset. It consists of a large number of disconnected nodes, that are tagged in a way that has no meaning in the OSM context, nor am I able to interpret them.

Please let us know where you are getting all these oddly located caravan sites. A number of them locations that I was familiar with did not have the caravan sites that you mapped. As I am no longer in India I can not check any more locations, but I have a hard time believing that there is a caravan site in the middle of this airport taxiway.

Additionally, as I've said before, Thai is not an appropriate language for name tags in India.

As such I am reverting your edit.

Sorry not to leave more time after your comment upendrakarukonda, but I've contacted this user in the past about errors (often carivan_site nodes), and not received a reply.

I've now reverted this changeset, as it contains a number of identifiable errors, and inexplicably uses Thai language for the name tags, and duplicates already mapped things, with incorrect tags.

Chalit, I do not mean to cause offence, or discourage you from contributing to OSM. However, for your edits to be constructive some improvements are necessary. http://learnosm.org/en/ is a great resource, but is unfortunately not available in Thai at this time.

I've reverted this edit, as I have been to the location of the caravan site, and there is not one in this location. Thai language is not appropriate for use in name tags in India.

While I do not know that the other additions are inaccurate, I do not feel that the edit is reliable.

I'd be interested to hear abou the meaning of your edit, and the process you used to come up with these nodes in either way.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that I have reverted this changeset.

I have not been able to find any nodes that are correctly tagged in it. The majority of the nodes are just name=`xxx`, with `xxx` being a 3 digit number. The odd node has name=`note`, with `note` being a some sort of description of road conditions or an amenity. Some of these nodes would have been useful uploaded as notes (you can add these using the speech bubble icon on the right hand side of the main website, seehttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Notes for more info).

It should be pointed out that we do not map if a road is "crowded" or not, because this changes with time of day, etc, and we only map permanent things.

Also see http://learnosm.org/en/ to get a better idea of how mapping on OSM works.

I'm sorry to do this again, but I've not gotten any clarification on why you're adding Thai language name (and name:hi) tags to places in India, so I've reverted this edit.

I can't say definitively that any of these tags are inaccurate, but that camp-site looks pretty unlikely in the Bing imagery (more like a parking lot), and I have seen some nodes uploaded by you that definitely do not reflect the situation on the ground.

Please clarify what's going on with your edits.

The route with less switchbacks is the main road now, what had been tagged as the NH3 is an old fragment of it that is the unfavoured route, is very rough and very steep. I mistakenly took it, to my regret.

This also seems to be a bunch of nodes that have been erroneously uploaded. They seem to refer to directions provided by a GPS devise for someone's trip at some point. Also this is not in HP, as the summery states.

All of the nodes added by this edit contain only name tags, with no other tags. The name tags make no sense, eg "name=522 - STRAIGHT AT JUNCTION",or just "name=512".

Because of this I reverted this edit, with the changeset: changeset/41354365

Please see: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/50049 for more info on this edit.

Porpoise Bay Park was divided up into 4 blocks, with the road dividing it east/west, and an additional north south divide that did not seem to be for any reason, or correspond with any physical feature. Nor is it shown on other maps. As such I have joined the north sections with the south sections. Now the road divides the park into two sections, as with many other parks with a road through them.

As some of the same lines were used for park boundary and Sechelt City boundary this edit effected that as well, but no changes were made to the boundary demarcation.

Thanks! That's a nice restaurant.

Oops, this was a Bing trace, not the strava data.

I'd like to add a bit more info on my paper maps I mentioned in the edit summery source tag.

I have 5 paper maps that have this town noted on it, from 4 publishers. These maps are from China, the UK, and the Tibetan refugees in India. All the maps note either 安多, ཨ་མདོ, or Amdo (ie, all variations on the same thing), as the prominent name. I can provide more info if needed.

I provided the wrong source in the changeset tags. I forgot to update it in JOSM. The correct source is Bing.

Well, I have no idea why, but after my meaningless edit, and refreshing my browser, the buildings all showed up. Most odd. I hope I didn't make a mistake when I first added them...

I mistakenly forgot to update the source tag. I used Bing imagery for this edit, not BC Mosaic.

Once again I forgot to change the Source field in Josm. This actually used BC Mosaic, and not Bing, as a source.

oops, I forgot to update the source field, this edit was just a Bing trace. Only my last edit was from wikipedia.