At least two of the buildings in this edit mistakenly have a single address added, when two exist in reality. (way/331442853/history and way/331442829/history)

It's cool you added the Russian name to the church, but I've moved it to the `name:ru` tag. If you have Russian language skills it'd be great to get some more multilingual `name:ru` tags around the Vancouver, but I don't think it should go into the default `name` tag, even for Russian things like this church. спасибо!

Very amusing, but I think it should be removed. Do I really need to say why?

Thanks Arun, that's kind of you to say. Means lots coming from a pro.

Maybe I should add that I also walked by this block today, and checked the progress of the building on Main Street. While it is not ready for people to move in yet, the construction of the structure is completed. As it is not visible in the imagery yet, the trace is very approximate.

This edit removes all tags, except the name tag, from Griffen Switchbacks. Was this done because the path is no longer publicly accessible? If so wouldn't adding `access=no` be more appropriate?

Fair enough. I'll have to pay attention if I'm in there again.

Is the post office actually inside Nesters? I've been there a number of times, and don't remember seeing it, but wasn't actually looking for a post office.

Thanks for the info, I have reverted my edit, and the node is back, with its edit history maintained: node/7120449583

That said, is this the best way to tag it? I think my original confusion was expecting an object that was more oriented for tourists. Would tagging it as some sort of memorial make more sense? Or... Something else?

I can't verify the name tag, as I don't remember if the named business is still at that location, or has moved.

I've deleted this node, as I'm familiar with this intersection, and there is nothing here that I can see this node reasonably representing. Please correct me if I am mistaken.

I say impossible river crossings, impossible at present, but I am only temporarily visiting town. It may be more possible at other times. I am still convinced that this trail, if it exists at all, was so inaccurately mapped that deletion was the only sensible thing to do.

This edit adds a `bicycle=no` tag to the Songdai Expressway, but does not say what this is based on. Is it based on local signage, an assumption, or something else?

Thank you very much for doing this SomeoneElse. I fully support reverting the changesets.

I've added a note, asking about the addition of the `access=no` tag added to the section of Vanness Ave with this edit. If you can provide more info could you please do so on the note:

note/1944032

I hope to hear from you. Thanks!

weird. This is tagged as part of #osmnepal, but is far from Nepal.

In reality the sections of road that are inaccessible to the public are likely to be much longer than this, as border areas are sensitive military areas, with restricted access to the public. But with these tags, I hope that routers will not try to send people across closed crossings.

Ok, thanks.

I don't think there's any rule against mapping two far flung locations, but it does make it harder for other mappers to know the location of your edits. I've seen very experienced editors doing it, but I don't think it's a good idea. In this case I was looking at some changes in Canada, and was trying to figure out if this edit could have affected a Canadian river. There are tools that could have given more more accurate info about what was edited, but they are time consuming to use.

Thanks for your quick reply. Maybe I shouldn't write so much about my opinion. You really didn't do anything wrong.

Is this an automated edit? If so was it discussed?