And this one too: way/331422517/history

It is probably worth pointing out that I posted a question on help.osm.org about this: https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/65629/should-riverbanks-be-tagged-as-naturalcoastline

Alright. Thanks. I started to do that, but was finding it more of a headache to figure out how it had been tagged than I expected. Then I procrastinated.

Yeah, you make valid point.

Huh. To me that feels like mapping one thing twice. Tasting rooms and breweries are not the same thing, but they are still part of the same establishment.

But I respect your judgement, if you'd rather tag the outline as the brewery and add a node for the tasting room, I'll let them be.

That's the one. I was being a bit silly prong that in the edit summery, especially because I don't expect people to read those edit summaries. At least not often.

Also I was kind ignoring the point of the article, by only tracing the curb around a traffic island, which seems pretty irrelevant for the potential uses the blog post was advocating.

Thanks for your message.

I'd forgotten about these turn restrictions. The restrictions had been put in place before I made this edit, but seem to have been some sort of trial of additional traffic calming/diversion on the Lakewood bike route. There had been plastic bollards and signage about turn restrictions. The bollards are definitely gone, and I think the signage is gone too.

While there continues to be lots of other measures in place, this one seems to have been removed.

I've deleted the turn restrictions, and will inspect the intersection next time I am passing by, to see if any restrictions remain.

This one too: way/109684770

Another address error I've fixed on this building: way/102521333

I forgot to update the source field, it should be "survey".

This building (way/160290132) also contained an error, should have been 3 addresses, not one. I've fixed it.

This edit contains at least one error, this (way/309854489) building contained one address, when in fact it has 3 separate addresses. I've fixed it by moving the addresses to nodes.

Thanks for updating the node.

Another error in the address added to this building:

way/291869937

There are multiple addresses to this building, and they are already added to the nodes of the business's.

I mistakenly forgot to update Josm's source tag. I should have said "local knowledge"

Two more buildings with addressing errors in this changeset:

way/536535030

way/309857585

Thanks for seeing my note and changing the name of the plaza. To tell the truth I'd forgotten all about it.

Additionally a building (way/331422458) had an address tagged on the building outline, but in fact the building contained at least two addresses. I've fixed it, after doing a site survey.

I don't mean to give you a hard time, but this changeset also contains at least one error, with a single address for a building (way/309857586) that has multiple (at least 5) addresses. I've fixed it.

This one (way/160289773) too.