Thanks for letting me know. I just took a quick look, and the DigitalGlobe imagery looks great! I'll have to spend a bit more time looking over the area.

The improved Bing imagery didn't come out very long ago (was that 6 months ago?), so I'd think there's *lots* of room for improving some basic mapping in the area.

Have you looked at the Kashmir Valley? There *thousands* of small and medium sized roads that have not been mapped.

I should have added a link to the object (the post code boundary) in question. Here it is: way/364312266

Welcome, and thanks for your contribution to OSM. I did notice that this edit did contain an error, where a postal code boundry was retagged as a footway. This may have been done when you didn't relize you had more than one object selected, or it may have been that you did not check what tags were on the object before you changed them.

I've fixed it now, but please check over the other modified objects to see if you can identify any other errors. Feel free to let me know if you find any mistakes you are not sure how to fix.

Thanks for letting me know. I had noticed that this naming error was present, but had thought it'd originally be someone else's error. Maybe it was me. In any case I'd discussed it previously on this changeset discussion: changeset/37239468.

I've now edited the riverbank and island tags (changeset/48317592) and think that everything should be sorted out. Feel free to review it and let me know if there are any issues.

I've edited the riverbank relation's and island's name tags (changeset/48317592) and think it should be good now. Please feel free to take a look and let me know if there are any issues.

Thanks for the info, and the quick response. I've deleted the place_of_worship: changeset/47989901

This was me experimenting with editing capabilities of OsmAnd+. One thing I noticed is that it does not allow a source tag to be added. In this case the source was me surveying the buildings. Also it just lets me add nodes, not to add the address to the building.

Any idea why the riverbank relation of the Seymour River has the `name=Bear Island` tag on it? This seems like a mistake. If I don't hear otherwise I'll delete this tag, and may try to simplify the relation.

I probably should say that I took off the oneway=yes tag from the section of the sidewalk between the Mt Seymour Parkway & Lillooet Rd intersection and cross-walk across the Trans-Canada off ramp because there is no signage specifying it as oneway. The sidewall continues further south, and I left the oneway=yes tag on it as I am unaware of signage in this area.

"thang" is a suffices that indicates a plataux or plane in Tibetan and Ladakhi, this is an odd name for such a minor crag. Also tagging it as a peak does not seem very accurate, as it is a small hill within a valley.

This edit changes a building into a park, inaccurately. I see that this is tippytoes first edit, I will assume that it was accidental, though the edit summery makes that a tenuous assumption.

Please take a look at http://learnosm.org/en/ for a great introduction on editing OSM, and use care when making edits, mistakes like this do go live to all users without a review process.

I'm wondering about the place_of_worship that was added by this edit. It is a very odd location for some sort of place_of_worship, and I suspect that it is an error.

There is certainly not a place_of_worship visible from outside the building. Nor is it particularly useful to have a node tagged as a place_of_worship w/o specifying the religion.

If there is not more info available I'd like to remove this node.

oops, the source wasn't bing, it was a survey.

I'm not sure if this is the best way to map these structures, but I can't come up with a better one.

I was messing around with the Maps.me app to see how easy it is to add addresses with it. It's ok, still a few more taps then I'd like, and would be nice if it gave a source tag to the changeset, "survey" in this case.

It would be a good idea to read osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines. The short story is that imports should only be done with great care. I'm still not convinced that this import is beneficial, and will ask the DWG to take a look.

That's rad. It sure beats my method of checking OsmAnd when I ride past a new station. I wish I had your python skills.

If you are like me, and feel a kind of thrill when you download the data for an area through JOSM, and it returns "No data found in this area" then try to do some mapping in this area.

Its pretty fun, with lots of rivers, streams, lakes, and road completely unmapped. :-)

Hi mappered1, this edit is an error. There may have been a gas station at the 7-11 at one point (a few years back?), but there is not one there at present, Well, wasn't a couple hours ago, when I double checked.

Thanks for adding this Francois. I've seen a couple new stations, but both times I checked and you've already added them.