I forgot to update the source tag on this changeset, it should read BC Mosaic, not Mapbox.

I am pleased that I remembered to check this when I was cycling past on the seawall today. The wreck is no longer present, so I've deleted the node representing it.

I'm not sure why this came through w/o a comment, but it was just me adding some house numbers to buildings.

Huh. Thanks for the info.

I don't know if that qualifies for the `historic`=* tag.

I'll try to remember to take a look at the site next time I'm in the area, because if the derelict pleasure craft is gone that would remove any need for debate over the historic nature of the craft.

Pretending that sidewalks that allow use by cyclists are bike ways does not help cyclists, it just obfuscates the reality of the infrastructure. Also footways are visible on most (all?) renderings, but if they didn't that'd be no reason to use inaccurate tags, as we do not want to tag things for how they will be rendered. See: osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

I'm not aware of this shipwreck, and am fairly familiar with this part of town. Does this represent a wreck that is still present at the site? Or was a pleasure craft that was briefly stranded here?

Oops, I forgot to update the source tag on this changeset. It should have been BC Mosaic, and no Survey.

I've deleted one campsite that was added in this edit, as it was clearly inaccurate. I'm not sure if there are other objects added to North Van with this changeset that should be removed.

@Chetan_Gowda, I'd like to thank for the response too. I saw it on the map, and was surprised for there to be so many buildings in a park, but your response and some googling has convinced me that it's tagged correctly.

As per the CoV website some buildings have come down, and others have gone up. Looking at the Bing Imagery I think that we have some of the nonexistent buildings mapped, and the new ones missing, but they were under construction when the Bing imagery was taken.

This changeset adds the `name=Sunrise Bikeway` tag to an alley. This seems like it is likely an error, as I am not aware of any alleys with names in Vancouver, and this is not part of the (nearby) Sunrise bike route.

If I am mistaken please let me know, otherwise I plan to delete the name tag. I've also opened a note (note/1029687) that would probably be the best way to respond, to keep the info more clearly visible to others. Thanks!

Thanks for these edits Alan! I added the first roads to Wood Lake Park just the other day, it's great to see so many details in the park now. :-)

Thanks for letting me know. I just took a quick look, and the DigitalGlobe imagery looks great! I'll have to spend a bit more time looking over the area.

The improved Bing imagery didn't come out very long ago (was that 6 months ago?), so I'd think there's *lots* of room for improving some basic mapping in the area.

Have you looked at the Kashmir Valley? There *thousands* of small and medium sized roads that have not been mapped.

I should have added a link to the object (the post code boundary) in question. Here it is: way/364312266

Welcome, and thanks for your contribution to OSM. I did notice that this edit did contain an error, where a postal code boundry was retagged as a footway. This may have been done when you didn't relize you had more than one object selected, or it may have been that you did not check what tags were on the object before you changed them.

I've fixed it now, but please check over the other modified objects to see if you can identify any other errors. Feel free to let me know if you find any mistakes you are not sure how to fix.

Thanks for letting me know. I had noticed that this naming error was present, but had thought it'd originally be someone else's error. Maybe it was me. In any case I'd discussed it previously on this changeset discussion: changeset/37239468.

I've now edited the riverbank and island tags (changeset/48317592) and think that everything should be sorted out. Feel free to review it and let me know if there are any issues.

I've edited the riverbank relation's and island's name tags (changeset/48317592) and think it should be good now. Please feel free to take a look and let me know if there are any issues.

Thanks for the info, and the quick response. I've deleted the place_of_worship: changeset/47989901

This was me experimenting with editing capabilities of OsmAnd+. One thing I noticed is that it does not allow a source tag to be added. In this case the source was me surveying the buildings. Also it just lets me add nodes, not to add the address to the building.

Any idea why the riverbank relation of the Seymour River has the `name=Bear Island` tag on it? This seems like a mistake. If I don't hear otherwise I'll delete this tag, and may try to simplify the relation.

I probably should say that I took off the oneway=yes tag from the section of the sidewalk between the Mt Seymour Parkway & Lillooet Rd intersection and cross-walk across the Trans-Canada off ramp because there is no signage specifying it as oneway. The sidewall continues further south, and I left the oneway=yes tag on it as I am unaware of signage in this area.