Could you please explain a bit more in detail to FreedSky why you reverted his edits?!

Ok, sounds logical ;)

it's better to add the tags to the relations but the single ways; for the ways source tag is enough ;)

ok - I removed it. I didn't check for new imagery though - just had a look at http://volcano.si.edu/volcano.cfm?vn=243040

Ha! That was good! Thanks, didn't notice ;) I thought I was editing 大埔水庫 in Guangxi - but zh.wiki redirects 大埔水庫 to 峨眉湖 in TW.

I'm curious: what exactly means source=SERVIR ?

I wished you'd start mapping a bit more in detail - there's enough imagery available where you've mapped - even if it's mapbox imagery.... (sigh!)

Naja - bei so kleinen sachen ist es wohl kein problem, aber bei meinetwegen grossen waldgebieten, dere grenze eine strasse ist, würde ich es nicht machen. Ich würde immer trennen, denn landuse fängt ja eh nicht direkt am mittelstreifen an, sondern da mag es noch einen radweg geben oder einen graben o.ä. und das macht drei oder mehr meter unterschied.

Wenn's übrigens ein echter bauernhof ist, dann nimm besser farmyard ;)

Das benutzen verschiedener tag-kategorien auf einem weg kann manchmal die sache verkomplizieren: landuse mit highway oder river mit boundary - außerdem kann dann nur ein name vergeben werden (beispiel für fluss und grenze getrennt hier: osm.org/go/2rCyU4ldo ) Andererseits sind auch zwei wege direkt übereinander in einigen editoren schwierig zur händeln - erst gestern fragte frau im chat kanal, wie sie denn den unteren weg selektieren könne im iD editor...

Ey kumma! noch einer aus'm pott! ;)

Im #osm IRC kanal hat einer gemeckert, datta wieder einer eine strasse mit landuse mixt (way/394288200) - dat is ein dauerstreit (auch wenn ich mir osm.wiki/Talk:Key:landuse anschaue) Ich mixe nicht, aber ich benutze auch josm, wo das wohl leichter zu managen ist... dat nur so nebenbei gesacht ;)

Fantastic! Then you know it very well and can add and edit roads, road names, schools, hospitals, industrial areas, scenic sites, mountain names, forests and orchards - all kind of information!

;)

rougher first iterations do not make sense in my mind - or are you in a hurry?
;)

Your edits are still very rough although there exits bing imagery - why?

thanks - well nothing was "broken" though but the boundary was just difficult to maintain ;)

Your tag is ok (as long as it does won't show up on the map) - user erkinalp has created that "proposed" highway 6 years ago but there is no imagery whatsoever showing any built motorway there around...

Is it possible that you've added highway=unclassified to ALL ways?

I've no idea :)

user geohiker2010 created the way and added the tag 9/11/2011.

The Van earthquake occurred 23.10.2011. Therefore I suppose it was HOT editing.

You're welcome ;-)

Recently I saw the news about flooding in Kelantan and Terengganu and noticed that some states were still missing... sources are large images from google search and wikipedia (which I used to roughly trace over with josm's piclayer plugin) and rivers (for example Sungai Kerian) where I duplicated the way.

Btw: would you give the Federal Territories the tag place=state?

ok, nice :D
but please add a note with the content of your initial changeset comment so that it is clear that there are two Fujian relations. To make it even clearer one could name the Taiwan part Fukien Province.

I was not able to revert the changeset using josm's revert plugin.
BTW: English wiki says for Fujian: For the part of Fujian province administered by the Republic of China, see Fukien Province.
@Supaplex Do you mean that Fujian?