katpatuka's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 81801029 | over 5 years ago | Hello 完善区划, I've changed the north-western boundary of 贡井区 and aligned it parallel to waterways - tell me please if I was wrong; |
| 60294701 | over 5 years ago | These junction names like 泸州绕城南段/泸州蓝田/G93/合江/重庆/G4215/赤水/遵义 are a little bit -err- long - can you do something about it ? ;) |
| 60278676 | over 5 years ago | Can you confirm that 焦滩乡 (合江县) has been renamed 神臂城镇 ? (node/5728384102 ) It's not yet reflected on zhwiki... |
| 3317335 | over 5 years ago | Done. I wished there were district boundary sources for Pakistan available... :/ |
| 3317335 | over 5 years ago | 10 years' ago edit ;) enwiki says FATA has been merged with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (5. source) - I go and merge them... ;) |
| 27971499 | almost 6 years ago | Some time has past since I last edited in Malaysia - so I'm not up to date with the subject ;) The way id you gave has been edited 26 times by different users; the second part to Kampung Beng starting from the crossing over to Kota Tampan I'd say looks like a tertiary. Google Maps lets the A167 end near Kamping Bukit Sapi; I do not have knowledge where the all the refs come from and if there is possibly reference data on data.gov.my and ... |
| 80417943 | almost 6 years ago | Erledigt ;) |
| 80417943 | almost 6 years ago | Do you have the way ids? This tag is currently on township node node/7177214597 - so if you found it on ways it must have been a accidently paste error... |
| 63591244 | almost 6 years ago | No need to delete SWBD sourced lakes - just retrace them (if they are not TOO big) ;) Some day someone (from time to tome like me) will come and retrace them anyway... :) |
| 63878993 | almost 6 years ago | Well - of the two reservoirs I mentioned above only the nodes where left over, no ways and they where seemingly SWBD sourced. I usually retrace such reservoirs when stumbling on SWBD tagged reservoirs - if they are not TOO big ;) If they are set up as relation from time to time I retrace only part of the relation. No need to delete them: some day someone will come and retrace it... :) |
| 63878993 | almost 6 years ago | Hi ff5722, can you remember what happened here? Lots of reservoirs had been deleted - alone 3 in Daying 大英县... I've recreated 五五水库 and 寸塘口水库 |
| 52099551 | almost 6 years ago | Well - looking a current usable imagery (bing, no esriWorld, no maxar) it still looks as if being under construction. Even Chinese maps (tianditu, baidu, sogou using OvitalMap) show them still differently. If you have other imagery sources feel free to fix the status of these ways. ;) |
| 73970154 | almost 6 years ago | olabilir - zaten koordinatları WGS84 olarak yazılmadı için biraz tahminen çizdiğdim ;) |
| 27817775 | about 6 years ago | Well I gave it a try with Hulu Perak (relation/10411526 ) but the file is really not detailed enough. It is easy if the boundary follows mountain ridges which applies for Hulu Perak so I've traced over the corresponding mountain ridges shown on opentopomap layer. But other boundaries may be fuzzy if they are NOT following mountain ridges, rivers or roads... |
| 27817775 | about 6 years ago | hm - that seems to be a bit more difficult ;) Putrajaya is a small area but Perak is big while the wikipedia files seemingly aren't very detailed. If you or the Malaysian community know a legal source for "district shape files (.shp)" it might be do-able... |
| 27817775 | about 6 years ago | Using josm (java) editor I can add a picture layer (for Putrajaya https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Putrajaya_City_Precinct.svg ) which I than have to align against satellite imagery. In the case of Putrajaya I guess I used the lake to fit picture and sat imagery... BTW: Penang seems to be well covered in Chinese - well done :D (see https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=zh#9/4.3943/101.9751 ) |
| 77458274 | about 6 years ago | someone using osmand and editing in the region I'm living in! If you're still around and haven't been in Avanos yet just drop by! ;) |
| 52149377 | about 6 years ago | I wonder how good (bad?) zoomable Sentinel data is if you traced a highway instead of a stream...! (way/525660195) ;) |
| 69385932 | over 6 years ago | Is 峡州区 node/6416757593 a valid name? Not found on zhwiki... |
| 73510879 | over 6 years ago | Got it! I must have been confused/tired... ;) - fixed now: Hanling 韩陵镇 relation/9983347 Gaozhuang 高庄镇 relation/9941891 |