OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
81801029 over 5 years ago

Hello 完善区划,

I've changed the north-western boundary of 贡井区 and aligned it parallel to waterways - tell me please if I was wrong;

relation/2791315

60294701 over 5 years ago

These junction names like 泸州绕城南段/泸州蓝田/G93/合江/重庆/G4215/赤水/遵义 are a little bit -err- long - can you do something about it ? ;)

see osm.org/#map=14/28.7335/105.3288

60278676 over 5 years ago

Can you confirm that 焦滩乡 (合江县) has been renamed 神臂城镇 ? (node/5728384102 ) It's not yet reflected on zhwiki...

3317335 over 5 years ago

Done. I wished there were district boundary sources for Pakistan available... :/

3317335 over 5 years ago

10 years' ago edit ;)

enwiki says FATA has been merged with Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (5. source) - I go and merge them... ;)

27971499 almost 6 years ago

Some time has past since I last edited in Malaysia - so I'm not up to date with the subject ;) The way id you gave has been edited 26 times by different users; the second part to Kampung Beng starting from the crossing over to Kota Tampan I'd say looks like a tertiary.

Google Maps lets the A167 end near Kamping Bukit Sapi; I do not have knowledge where the all the refs come from and if there is possibly reference data on data.gov.my and ...

80417943 almost 6 years ago

Erledigt ;)

80417943 almost 6 years ago

Do you have the way ids? This tag is currently on township node node/7177214597 - so if you found it on ways it must have been a accidently paste error...

63591244 almost 6 years ago

No need to delete SWBD sourced lakes - just retrace them (if they are not TOO big) ;) Some day someone (from time to tome like me) will come and retrace them anyway... :)

63878993 almost 6 years ago

Well - of the two reservoirs I mentioned above only the nodes where left over, no ways and they where seemingly SWBD sourced. I usually retrace such reservoirs when stumbling on SWBD tagged reservoirs - if they are not TOO big ;) If they are set up as relation from time to time I retrace only part of the relation. No need to delete them: some day someone will come and retrace it... :)

63878993 almost 6 years ago

Hi ff5722, can you remember what happened here? Lots of reservoirs had been deleted - alone 3 in Daying 大英县... I've recreated 五五水库 and 寸塘口水库

52099551 almost 6 years ago

Well - looking a current usable imagery (bing, no esriWorld, no maxar) it still looks as if being under construction. Even Chinese maps (tianditu, baidu, sogou using OvitalMap) show them still differently. If you have other imagery sources feel free to fix the status of these ways. ;)

73970154 almost 6 years ago

olabilir - zaten koordinatları WGS84 olarak yazılmadı için biraz tahminen çizdiğdim ;)

27817775 about 6 years ago

Well I gave it a try with Hulu Perak (relation/10411526 ) but the file is really not detailed enough. It is easy if the boundary follows mountain ridges which applies for Hulu Perak so I've traced over the corresponding mountain ridges shown on opentopomap layer. But other boundaries may be fuzzy if they are NOT following mountain ridges, rivers or roads...

27817775 about 6 years ago

hm - that seems to be a bit more difficult ;)

Putrajaya is a small area but Perak is big while the wikipedia files seemingly aren't very detailed. If you or the Malaysian community know a legal source for "district shape files (.shp)" it might be do-able...

27817775 about 6 years ago

Using josm (java) editor I can add a picture layer (for Putrajaya https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/ab/Putrajaya_City_Precinct.svg ) which I than have to align against satellite imagery. In the case of Putrajaya I guess I used the lake to fit picture and sat imagery...

BTW: Penang seems to be well covered in Chinese - well done :D (see https://maps.wikimedia.org/?lang=zh#9/4.3943/101.9751 )

77458274 about 6 years ago

someone using osmand and editing in the region I'm living in! If you're still around and haven't been in Avanos yet just drop by! ;)

52149377 about 6 years ago

I wonder how good (bad?) zoomable Sentinel data is if you traced a highway instead of a stream...! (way/525660195)

;)

69385932 over 6 years ago

Is 峡州区 node/6416757593 a valid name? Not found on zhwiki...

73510879 over 6 years ago

Got it! I must have been confused/tired... ;) - fixed now:

Hanling 韩陵镇 relation/9983347

Gaozhuang 高庄镇 relation/9941891