Hej KelseyGoosen,

there is no need to tag descriptive Names to buildings that describe a status of a building. Buildings in OpenStreetMap are only named when it's an actual name.

Otherwise people have to go through these houses again and remove the descriptive name.

Thank you

Hej,

this again seems like an import of data. You have not yet answered any questions regarding your data sources.
Please answer them before continuing to upload questionable data.

osm.org/user_blocks/4858
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10196162

автоматический перевод:
Эй,

это снова похоже на импорт данных. Вы еще не ответили ни на один вопрос относительно ваших источников данных.
Пожалуйста, ответьте на них, прежде чем продолжить загрузку сомнительных данных.

osm.org/user_blocks/4858
https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10196162

Hej,

in this changeset you have deleted a lot of buildings that are stil present (http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102762424). Although some of them did not seem right or present (as in scrubs mapped as buildings) and falsly tagged, please don't just delete all of them. If you can, please improve the existing buildings.

I have restored most of the buildings.
Thank you.

Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have deleted almost all buildings before mapping new buildings or improved versions. (as seen in http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102679919). Please try to improve existing buildings even when they do not seem at the right position. Deleting objects to redraw them in the same way is not fair to previous mappers and not useful when looking at object history.
Thank you.

Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have deleted almost all buildings before mapping new buildings or improved versions. (as seen in http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102665431). Please try to improve existing buildings even when they do not seem at the right position. Deleting objects to redraw them in the same way is not fair to previous mappers and not useful when looking at object history.
Thank you.

Hej and welcome to OpenStreetMap,

it seems like you have deleted almost all buildings before mapping new buildings or improved versions. (as seen in http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=102526525). Please try to improve existing buildings even when they do not seem at the right position. Deleting objects to redraw them in the same way is not fair to previous mappers and not useful when looking at object history.
Thank you.

Deleting the roads will not stop the use of maps.me at this location. All you did was delete valid objects that need improvements. There are lots of visible roads here. I can see cars on the aerial imagery. You also deleted those bigger roads. Especially using a second account just for the deletion seems nefarious. As you have been editing for a bit you should know that there are quiet a few tagging options to improve this cemetary. You can always improve existing ways but deleting ways just to redraw them later (maybe if you feel like it) is not the way.
Also waiting for some other third party app to update so you can start improving seems wasteful since you could just start improving now so it may update accordingly next time. Either way, maps.me users will do what that want to do, if the roads are mapped here or not.

Since it seems like you would willingly just delete valid objects over and over I have made a report with the Data Working Group.

Hej,

in this changeset you have massively deleted a lot of points resulting in a lot of broken objects. A lot of houses have been split in half or are left as unclosed or self-intersecting features.
What is the reason for this deletion? hashtags as changeset comments are not very useful.
Are you going to fix the resulting issues?
https://osmcha.org/changesets/101793211

Best regards

I can undestand that you want to clean-up nodes that have been added with false categories or as private bookmarks. But neither are highways spam points nor are they not existing here. If you delete them now, someone will add them later anyway. Because they exist, regardless how narrow they are. Deletion is not an option and deleting the whole highways system is just plain vandalism.
You can choose to improve the actual classification or type of the highways. That is how you should go about here.

Hej Mahmood_abdul,

welcome to OpenStreetMap.
You have deleted a lot of ways here that are visible on aerial imagery. Please respect the work of other users.

This changeset has been reverted due to vandalism.

Best regards

Hej,

this is obviously an import of data.
Can you present your actual source or procedure here?
Also see: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Thank you.

Эй,

это, очевидно, импорт данных.
Можете ли вы представить здесь ваш реальный источник или процедуру?
См. Также: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines.

Спасибо.

Hej,

objects like way/919256253 or way/919256999 seemingly point to you importing data that is not sourced as Mapbox Satellite. Please tell us the real source of this import. Furthermore please read the import guidelines: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

I respectfully request an answer from you on this.
You have not answered any of the issues with your changesets in the past: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10196162
OpenStreetMap is a community where communication with other members is key. So please interact.

Best regards

Эй,

такие объекты, как way/919256253 или way/919256999, по-видимому, указывают на то, что вы импортируете данные, которые не получены как Mapbox Satellite. Расскажите, пожалуйста, об истинном источнике этого импорта. Кроме того, ознакомьтесь с правилами импорта: osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines

Я с уважением прошу у вас ответа по этому поводу.
Вы не ответили ни на одну из проблем с вашими наборами изменений в прошлом: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=10196162
OpenStreetMap - это сообщество, в котором общение с другими участниками является ключевым. Так что, пожалуйста, взаимодействуйте.

С уважением

Hej,

I have noticed that you are deleting a lot of buildings to partly redraw them in a different way.
This is not how this is suposed to work. Please improve existing buildings. Deleting and redrawing whole blocks of buildings is not fair to contributors who had done the work beforehand.

Best regards

Hej,

Saya perhatikan bahwa Anda menghapus banyak bangunan untuk digambar ulang sebagian dengan cara yang berbeda.
Seharusnya ini bukan cara kerja ini. Harap perbaiki bangunan yang ada. Menghapus dan menggambar ulang seluruh blok bangunan tidak adil bagi kontributor yang telah melakukan pekerjaan sebelumnya.

salam Hormat

Heute: Schilder sagen immer noch Wissmannstr. Das Amazon-CS basiert auf Ankündigung und fragwürdigem "internal feedback". Die Methodik der Änderung, ignorierte andersweitige tags, kann man auch in Frage stellen. Empfehle revert (for now).

Wenn du dahingehend selber keine Recherche anstellen willst, empfehle ich hier mit der deutlichen Mehrheit zu gehen. Im Datensatz ist die Mehrheit dieser Namen als Anfangsbuchstabe groß, Rest klein geschrieben. Ob das jetzt in Großbuchstaben irgendwo steht, ist dabei kein Kriterium. dm bildet die Ausnahme. Grundsätzlich stehen Namen komplett in Großbuchstaben für Abkürzungen die vermieden werden sollen.

Hej cs_slavik,

in this changeset you have added a lot of areas which are self-intersecting. Is this maybe because this is an import of external data? If so, what is the actual source? If not, please try to upload data that has gone through validation next time. JOSM can detect self-intersecting polygons and here there should have been a lot of errors detected.

Thanks and best regards

____

автоматический перевод:

Эй cs_slavik,

в этом наборе изменений вы добавили много самопересекающихся областей. Может это потому, что это импорт внешних данных? Если да, то каков фактический источник? Если нет, попробуйте загрузить данные, прошедшие проверку в следующий раз. JOSM может обнаруживать самопересекающиеся полигоны, и здесь должно было быть обнаружено много ошибок.

Спасибо и всего наилучшего

Habe mal die sichtbaren (https://osmcha.org/changesets/100711615/) Verschiebungen zurückgesetzt.

Schöne Grüße

Gibt dazu noch eine Gebäudeüberschneidung hier. Würde mal denken, die Lage im ALKIS-Layer passt da denke ichschon besser, mit dem Unterschied, dass es beide Gebäude zur Notaufnahme verbindet. Ansonsten so wie !bm vorschlägt. Eher roof. Denke es ist eher so als parking_space für Krankenwagen gedacht.

Hej,

you have been asked why you are still executing destructive mapping practises: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12373681

Since you have not answered and kept on deleting many buildings without any reason I have reported you to the Data Working Group.

Please improve existing objects. Area wide deletions are not the way to go and are also not intended by HOTOSM.
Please also keep in mind that this platform is about communication and since there have been questions and comments to you, you should atleast show some response. Otherwise there might also be an assumption of bad will.

Best regards.

Hej,
you have repeatedly created notes at the same position: @Homo%20liberus/notes?page=1
Your app might have an issue/bug.

Also there doesn't seem to a monument where you put "Place of death of Cesare Borgia". Can you please verify?

Best regards