Hi Sparks, thanks for contributing to OSM. While I was working in this area, I found that you added a natural=water in a way, but I think that tag is for a multipolygon which already exists in the same place.

Hi AleBM
Thank you for contributing to OSM. While working in this area, I found you deleted some highways that according to your comment are on a private property. However, why not adding the `access = private` tag instead of deleting them?

Also this changeset changeset/37716174

Hi Nate_Wessel
Thank you for contributing to OSM, while working on this area, I found you deleted some highways which clearly exist based on Bing satellite imagery. So did you delete them for any special reason?

Hey there!
Thank you for having fixed the conflict since you contribute to improving the map.

Hey there!
Thanks for your feedback. The correction is in this [changeset](changeset/41373960).

Hey again Andy!
You are completely right. We should take care about the quality of the data. However, both roads I've edited - Mullinax Circle and the private one - don't have deleted tags by the newbie mapper, but added tags. So I just moved the point that was causing the impossible angle. And thanks for fixing this area.

Hey there!
I agree with you. We should definitely maintain the original tags and relations involved with the road, and that's what I did. If you can see the original tags before my edit was [highway=primary] and [oneway=-1], so I just split the road and added the necessary tags for a bridge to the new segment.
Thanks for fixing those segments and controbuting to OSM.

Hi Andy;
I made a mistake uploading two changes in different areas, I will be more careful with these kind of changes.
Thanks for your feedback.

Hey Matt1993;
I've found your edits where you added turn lanes but it does not match with satellite images also the number of lanes does not match with turn:lanes, maybe it is a local knowledge.

Hey Jeffrey;
I realigned the road using GSI Japan Satellite (ort) , but I've already [reverted] (changeset/39861887) my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.

Hi! Thanks for adding those relations.
I'm fixing connectivity issues. I don't know this place, so I can't add relations. Thanks for your feedback.

This is the link of my reverted changeset: changeset/38393541

Hello!
I was fixing highway intersections that aren't connected, but I've already reverted my changeset on 38393541 .
Thank you for your feedback.

Hi aceman444,
Thanks for your feedback and fixing the wrong junction.
I was working on connectivity errors using [to-fix](http://osmlab.github.io/to-fix) and did not realize the missing junction was intentional. So I'll be more careful in these case. Thanks again.

There is a mistake of type: crossing building.
node/3897176114/history

There are some buildings with mistake of type: crossing building. Could you check out?

There are some buildings with mistake of type: crossing building, could you check out?

There are some building with mistake of type: crossing building. Could you check out?

There is a mistake of type: crossing building.
node/3896055468/history