hi sefabaris!
I see that you added many objects without any tags in this area, also you added many buildings that generate crossing building error. Can you explain what is the reason for these editions? and please check these changesets too.

changeset/41937428
changeset/41938705
changeset/45943021
changeset/45943474

Regards.

Hi Andrew Mondragon!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I noticed that with this changeset, you have added lakes, parks and footways on this area, and you deleted a service highway. But those object that you added are not visible in the satellite imagery. May I know the reason for this please.
Regards.

Hi jvrjvrjvr!
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. While I was working on this area, I found that you added footway and a lake that not exist in the satellite imagery, so I fixed them.

Regards.

Hey J Martinez Jr!
I reverted this changeset to remove the fictional footways.

Regards.

Hi jennifercrespouniguajira!, thanks for contributing to OSM. While I was working in this area, I found that you deleted some buildings. Some special reason why you deleted them.
Regards!

Hi this_is_just_a_plug!, thanks for contributing to OSM. While I was working in this area, I found that you added some object such as grass, park and playground. I improved the geometry of the leisure=grass, but I dont know if are you sure that the park and playground is there now, if it is ok maybe you can improve the geometry according the satellite imagery.
Regards!

Hi again, oba510!
Thank you for bringing this to my notice and pointing out the apt way of labelling of this road. I have fixed the tag in this changeset (changeset/45298416). Thanks again.

Best,

Thank you for the feedback. As the selective filters were on, I didn't spot this building under construction. Reverting this changeset to remove the road added through the building. Thanks again

Hi Sparks, thanks for contributing to OSM. While I was working in this area, I found that you added a natural=water in a way, but I think that tag is for a multipolygon which already exists in the same place.

Hi AleBM
Thank you for contributing to OSM. While working in this area, I found you deleted some highways that according to your comment are on a private property. However, why not adding the `access = private` tag instead of deleting them?

Also this changeset changeset/37716174

Hi Nate_Wessel
Thank you for contributing to OSM, while working on this area, I found you deleted some highways which clearly exist based on Bing satellite imagery. So did you delete them for any special reason?

Hey there!
Thank you for having fixed the conflict since you contribute to improving the map.

Hey there!
Thanks for your feedback. The correction is in this [changeset](changeset/41373960).

Hey again Andy!
You are completely right. We should take care about the quality of the data. However, both roads I've edited - Mullinax Circle and the private one - don't have deleted tags by the newbie mapper, but added tags. So I just moved the point that was causing the impossible angle. And thanks for fixing this area.

Hey there!
I agree with you. We should definitely maintain the original tags and relations involved with the road, and that's what I did. If you can see the original tags before my edit was [highway=primary] and [oneway=-1], so I just split the road and added the necessary tags for a bridge to the new segment.
Thanks for fixing those segments and controbuting to OSM.

Hi Andy;
I made a mistake uploading two changes in different areas, I will be more careful with these kind of changes.
Thanks for your feedback.

Hey Matt1993;
I've found your edits where you added turn lanes but it does not match with satellite images also the number of lanes does not match with turn:lanes, maybe it is a local knowledge.

Hey Jeffrey;
I realigned the road using GSI Japan Satellite (ort) , but I've already [reverted] (changeset/39861887) my changeset. Thanks for your feedback.

Hi! Thanks for adding those relations.
I'm fixing connectivity issues. I don't know this place, so I can't add relations. Thanks for your feedback.