please refrain from tagging agriculture tracks as residential https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107963144

Please refrain from tagging agricultural tracks as residential. https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107942862

Service road connected to the wrong primary road. Fixed issue.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108013793

My apologies, I have used the wrong imagery. I still changed to service, as most likely within private land.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107950694

There is no clear road on satellite, geometry overlays buildings. Likely not residential. Reverting change
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107950694

Please use "name" for local language (Thai) and
"name:en" for English translation. Thank you!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109437102

FYI. Please kindly refrain from changing highway classifications and see guidelines for new additions https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/96#issuecomment-894739078

This is clearly a residential road.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109260695

thank you, I have added corrections to the bridge, and marked the road as residential as cars can access it.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109307018

Please refrain from adding residential roads within farming estate.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107949314

Please refrain from adding residential roads inside a religious site. You must use service for roads with any private property/facility/estate. If you are not sure, please do not add/tag. thank you https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/102482038

please refrain from adding geometries without a clear path. In this occurrence, one end has noexit=yes and from satellite, there is no clear line going all the way

Please refrain from adding long service road based on imagery satellite without local knowledge. From satellite view, road main purpose is access to agricultural fields.

You added a road that does not exist. Please refrain from adding poor-quality changes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/107955754

Hope all is well.

Would you mind please to always add a surface to track? (unpaved/paved if you are not sure of the exact type).

Grab is currently upgrading the minor road network in Thailand and turning a lot of farming and village tracks into highway=residential and others
Many of these dirt tracks had no surface specified, so the information is lost during the conversion.

https://github.com/cmoffroad/osm-guidelines/blob/main/README.md#add-surface-tag-important

Much appreciated.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109205700

How do you justify way/911546988 to be residential while there is no permanent residence along and the main purpose of the area is forestry?
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/108007637

Please make smaller change subsets. Each changeset should be within a small geographical area (e.g. 100km max), so it's easier for others to review changes.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/109120188

Please refrain from curving sharp corners:

https://github.com/GRABOSM/Grab-Data/issues/49#issuecomment-739779345

Bad tagging. Source tag missing. The whole area is private farm. Please correct accordingly.

I do not see a source tag so I assume you used Bing. The highway=path you added should be classified as track I believe. If you use recent satellite images like Maxar, it is pretty clear. From my experience, paths are rarely visible from satellite, when they are they stay as a thin line when zoomed in, unlike double tracks.