not sure what you did editing this one, but watch out. you converted to adjacent closed ways into weird multipolygons
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166035941

thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611

why add the business details to the area? now the bank and its address are split
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901835

in some cases, the amenity=school tag is on the area corresponding to the school grounds, and is not needed on the point.

i don't like mapping schools inconsistently like this, but it's good enough for now. maybe eventually we swap the amenity areas for `landuse=education`, but i think this is okay to leave as is.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165911711

i missed that one. good catch!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165938077

what happened here? i see you already fixed these with real footprints, but i'm curious what this was about
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165004479

watch your changeset comments, this wasn't a minooka edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165638963

make sure to change your changeset comment when you're doing different kinds of work
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165006476

you extended roads here, but left the noexit=yes tags on nodes further north. also the new streets you drew crossed without intersecting. disconnected streets can't be routed properly. i already fixed it!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400591

make sure your sidewalks stop at the pavement. the portion in the road would be highway=footway + footway=crossing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401320

oh, dangit. a little too fast on the trigger finger there, re-used my last changeset comment by accident. should say "fixing some erroneous edits to school areas"

thanks so much for updating these!

thanks for all these detailed edits to crossings! my only suggestion: if a crossing is marked, added a `crossing:markings` tag to make things as thorough as possible. happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163582277

i know this was a minute ago, but it looks like this name change was a mistake

keep an eye on your changeset comments. this isn't really work associated with the osmus task, it's address / entrance mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262639

there was already a residential area covering this, keep an eye out for those
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162399148

don't limit your features to the task tile! map the whole thing!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162399742

No worries! Editing where there's tree cover is tough. If you have a decent GPS, you can try to record your path as you walk along the edge of the beach, then use that GPS trace to guide your edit.

Your edit inadvertently tagged the entire pond and wooded area as a beach. I put it back to normal for now, but if you can't see the thing to map it, you can always leave a map note so that others can try to add the feature when imagery gets updated, maybe.

could you please try to keep your changeset areas smaller? your comment suggests you were adding buildings, but you were editing landuse features based on outdated imagery as well. a smaller, more focused changeset would make it easier on others who are reviewing recent edits.