1. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64974636 1 0 0 0

  2. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64942683 3 0 0 0

  3. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64903475 0 3 5 0

  4. name is tentative! local input most welcome!

    Closed
    #64843639 1 1 0 0

  5. aerodrome apparently disused

    Closed
    #64816951 0 1 0 0

  6. Avoiding double information: the aeronautical info is already given in node 3091391015

    Closed
    #64815192 0 2 0 0

  7. How some people can make things complicated! not doubting good intentions, of course, but please keep everything as simple as possible. Above all, please avoid creating double information - a major sin in database contents.

    Closed
    #64782029 0 1 0 0

  8. These two little areas were already mentioned as being part of the aerodrome - please avoid double information!

    Closed
    #64780696 0 2 0 0

  9. A new arriVAL AT BASULM.FFPLUM.FR

    Closed
    #64735668 1 0 0 0

  10. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64698488 0 1 0 0

  11. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64693377 0 1 0 0

  12. Waarom moest die benaming weg??

    Closed
    #64693218 0 1 0 0

  13. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64666751 4 0 0 0

  14. updated icao code according to maps.aopa.ru, usually a reliable source

    Closed
    #64617999 0 1 0 0

  15. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64573410 0 1 0 0

  16. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64573346 0 1 0 0

  17. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64572295 0 1 0 0

  18. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64572194 0 1 0 0

  19. (no comment)

    Closed
    #64572136 0 1 0 0

  20. Same remarks as for Brest and L'viv: no double information, please!!

    Closed
    #64572053 0 1 0 0