1. EG78 does not make sense, it is not a valid ICAO code. Perhaps the ICAO code was withdrawn? And "EG78" found in some local directory? But I am afraid it is not a current codification anyway. If EGOU is no longer valid, there is no valid ICAO code.

    Closed
    #59770833 0 1 0 0

  2. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59761008 0 1 0 0

  3. Operator as per Mr. Iborra's listing.

    Closed
    #59747193 0 1 0 0

  4. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59746926 0 1 0 0

  5. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59706317 0 1 0 0

  6. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59698104 0 1 0 0

  7. A recent addition on maps.aopa.ru. Local input very welcome!

    Closed
    #59698004 9 0 0 0

  8. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59663831 1 0 0 0

  9. Why was the ICAO code removed?

    Closed
    #59663622 0 2 0 2

  10. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59655010 0 2 0 0

  11. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59654995 3 0 0 0

  12. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59612110 0 1 0 0

  13. Not doubting the good intentions, but this was double information, and very confusing. The aerodrome has an excellent description in Relation 967676, there was no need to add or change anything.

    Closed
    #59610836 0 1 161 0

  14. There is only one aerodrome, not 26 ...

    Closed
    #59610746 0 7 0 0

  15. removed obvious nonsense

    Closed
    #59574142 0 0 4 0

  16. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59565484 0 1 0 0

  17. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59565450 0 1 0 0

  18. Minimal repair after battle damage :(

    Closed
    #59503112 1 0 1 0

  19. Minimal repair of battle damage :(

    Closed
    #59503054 0 1 0 0

  20. (no comment)

    Closed
    #59502966 1 0 0 0