1. If and when it is formally changed we shall update here, not earlier.

    Closed
    #53672937 0 1 0 0

  2. Again. no double info please. Cfr node 1616045357.

    Closed
    #53672746 0 1 0 4

  3. Aeronautical info already perfectly given in node 349987 - avoid double information! There is only one aerodrome at this location.

    Closed
    #53672708 0 1 0 0

  4. .

    Closed
    #53658772 0 2 0 0

  5. Aerodrome already very well defined in node, no double information please.

    Closed
    #53645513 0 1 0 0

  6. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53586890 1 0 0 0

  7. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53524060 0 1 0 0

  8. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53521408 0 1 0 0

  9. as found on www.ulm.it, but not very clear

    Closed
    #53521320 6 0 0 0

  10. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53502202 0 1 0 0

  11. LID code according to en:wikipedia

    Closed
    #53502152 0 2 0 0

  12. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53502112 4 0 0 0

  13. Aerodrome already well described in node 244055132 - please avoid double information. If this "way" description must really exist then please remove the node, after transferring its data. Thanks!

    Closed
    #53501085 0 1 12 0

  14. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53485431 4 0 0 0

  15. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53470581 0 1 0 1

  16. Reversal of inadvertent removal.

    Closed
    #53449071 1 0 0 0

  17. Some details settled.

    Closed
    #53446550 0 1 0 0

  18. (no comment)

    Closed
    #53431765 0 1 0 0

  19. Really sorry for your hard work and I do not doubt your good intentions, but we absolutely do not want double information in the database. Again, the airport is perfectly described in Way 23189598. Or if you think otherwise, pls. improve on the existing.

    Closed
    #53401718 0 0 89 0

  20. Resto added

    Closed
    #53360249 0 1 0 0