1. re-added removed aerodrome

    Closed
    #68225072 4 0 0 0

  2. Added smallish ultralight field

    Closed
    #68199883 5 0 0 0

  3. As an aerodrome, it is already given, to great detail, in Way 666909831 . Let us avoid double information.

    Closed
    #68107232 0 1 0 19

  4. Reluctant to call this a "heliport" - if it should really be considered one, better to add "name" and "operator" tags.

    Closed
    #68107049 0 1 0 0

  5. Reluctant to call this a "heliport" - if it should really be considered one, better to add "name" and "operator" tags.

    Closed
    #68106919 0 2 0 0

  6. "abandoned" rather than "disused"

    Closed
    #68050492 0 2 0 0

  7. use standard tagging scheme

    Closed
    #68030656 0 2 0 4

  8. added some detail

    Closed
    #68019211 0 1 0 0

  9. added some detail

    Closed
    #68019183 0 1 0 0

  10. .

    Closed
    #68018832 0 1 0 0

  11. .

    Closed
    #68018705 0 1 0 0

  12. Not a real aerodrome.

    Closed
    #68017999 0 1 0 0

  13. Not an aerodrome.

    Closed
    #67980507 1 1 0 0

  14. Piste trouvée sur basulm.ffplum.fr

    Closed
    #67958579 4 0 0 0

  15. Added Green Dragons Airstrip as found on ukairfieldguide

    Closed
    #67892365 0 1 0 0

  16. Added Green Dragons Airstrip as found on ukairfieldguide

    Closed
    #67890447 1 0 0 0

  17. Please do NOT remove the aeroway=aerodrome tag, a military aerodrome is an aerodrome too.

    Closed
    #67799973 0 1 0 0

  18. Ajout selon basulm

    Closed
    #67735468 0 1 0 0

  19. airstrip found on ukairfieldguide.com

    Closed
    #67734113 4 0 0 0

  20. airstrip found on ukairfieldguide.com

    Closed
    #67733898 1 0 0 0