Hi ArchangelEkim, thanks very much for catching and fixing this.

Yes, perhaps doesn't belong in OSM. Considering it has a full Wikipedia page (and is present tense) I thought perhaps it's been overlooked. If nobody else has heard of it happy to remove - will delete the node.

Thanks for this!

> we should probably just import the rest of them

That sounds good to me - I'm not quite comfortable running a JSOM batch import at this stage though.

Just to check - does adding in a couple of start_date's manually make the import harder? (I don't plan to import many more/if any manually)

Hi, thanks for that additional context - I will add these back. My mistake.
Thanks.

Hello, it was not a mistake to include it (I verified the cafe does still exists at that address), but I should have pushed the changeset before including it.
I did miss that the website is not live any more and see that’s already been corrected.
Thanks for checking.

Hi Mario, could I check how you determined the surfaces of these paths?
For example way/557211936 is tagged with a concrete surface (which I've now updated) but I'm fairly sure the tagging of concrete is incorrect.

Apologies, thanks for correcting!

Apologies - will make sure to keen changesets more confined in future!

This changeset is made up of some changes in Oslo, as well as a few small edits near Sørum.

Hi AntBurnett - if you're local to the area would you be able to resurvey this way and the adjacent one? way/61437113

I'm unsure if it's still a legal shared path. If you could also add a width tag on each section I'd really appreciate it. Thanks!

Hi Tanoh, could I check if the orange barriers blocking the cycleway have been removed? If not then I think the cycleway should be considered as still under construction (ie. unsafe to be used by cyclists) and this should be reverted.