OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
112765184 almost 4 years ago

Yep, I think that it should be ref=103_U379_074 instead of name=103_U379_074, but I'm not sure since I don't know where this codes came from

112765184 almost 4 years ago

Hi Ahmed,

these look more like ref=* than name=* values. Where do they came from by the way?

118381339 almost 4 years ago

Hi TrekClimbing,

just curious, what's the exact meaning of place=building_complex? You're the only one using this tag. It seems quite generic to me, it could be added to almost any landuse=residential, retail, commercial ecc.

118389485 almost 4 years ago

Hi kof2001ignis,

you added an invalid place=* value here, could you check it out please?

node/5941926540/history

118410656 almost 4 years ago

Uhm, I have some doubts about this: osm.wiki/Relations_are_not_categories

117000578 almost 4 years ago

Ciao Balaabirami,

qua c'è una way senza tag: way/1027673008

questo nodo ha come tag solo comment:it=area pedonale (node/9474021421), cosa rappresenta?

118367596 almost 4 years ago

Ciao, su OSM i tag sono per convenzione in inglese britannico, quindi larghezza=2 non va bene. Va usato width=2.

Inoltre per favore scrivi commenti ai changeset che descrivano ciò che hai modificato, qua trovi degli esempi: osm.wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

118374990 almost 4 years ago

Hi skipper76,

way/1039404054/history

what kind of place are the ones you added? place=yes is quite generic. Are they neighbourhood, city blocks, something else?

You can read some available values here: place=*

118355150 almost 4 years ago

Hi Stephen,

as I already tried to explain you (changeset/117973822):

names should not be descriptions. So name=hut+building=yes
should be
building=hut

118291442 almost 4 years ago

29.418 total changesets, 22.119 of them without comment.

At least 4 users already asked him to properly comment changesets in the last year:
1. changeset/96015876
2. changeset/112373185
3. changeset/117042655
4. changeset/117638017

118337524 almost 4 years ago

Hi Dimitar155,

node/9569531605

what type of place is this one? place=yes is quite generic

118301576 almost 4 years ago

This is their second try importing stuff: changeset/117872687

Good luck commenting them changesets, they didn't replied once: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15178304

118316907 almost 4 years ago

Hi Thomas,

I saw you added two place=Idsingen, I suppose you wanted to use addr:place=Idsingen?

118311811 almost 4 years ago

Hi MaksKZ,

way/673816457/history

place=residential is not a common value. Also the place you added is already mapped as a node (node/2598689068/history): osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

I would restore the previous situation, what you think?

118248001 almost 4 years ago

Hi Arbs,

I don't think the place=* node fits well a ski restort. Are you aware of this tags: osm.wiki/Winter_sports#Resorts ?

82019675 almost 4 years ago

Hi Ernesto, this comments are two years old but the tags are still there (example: way/779980768/history ), I see you're still an active user, could you fix them?

118189458 almost 4 years ago

Hi Chetan, why you deleted the old place node and created an identical new one instead of just moving it?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/118189458

118155419 almost 4 years ago

Ho linkato per sbaglio la way, la relazione è questa: relation/8368355

118155419 almost 4 years ago

Dal momento che i tag sono stati trasferiti da un elemento all'altro (dalla relazione alla way) ovviamente sembra lo abbia creato io, ma prendiamo ad esempio il landuse che avevi citato prima (la way/595901649): è stato creato tre anni come relazione (way/595901649/history). History e Pewu dando la storia del singolo elemento non danno una visione d'insieme, ma da OSMcha si vede. Ciao.

118146193 almost 4 years ago

Hi Chetan,

osm.wiki/Tag%3Aamenity%3Dshop

amenity=shop is deprecated, please don't use it anymore. Also please add a meaningful changeset comment: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments