Hi based_kronberger, thanks for your contributions!

I noticed a couple things:
way/175334415
here you did add the address to the building outline, but it was already present in the proper building relation: relation/2342359

way/1102636555
same here, you added the address to the outer way instead that to the relation, this edit also created a duplicated building

way/369730250
here you duplicated the address to a building:part. You also added the tag building, but an element can't be a part of a building and a building at the same time

way/175108137
here you changed addr:street from "Sheshi Skënderbej" to "Rruga Sheshi Skenderbej", but there's no element with such name in the database as far as I know
you also changed building=office to building=yes. Usually a value should changed from a generic one to a more specific one, not the opposite.

Hi divaddivag,

why did you add back a link to a non-existing image: node/1494437697/history ?

"This page does not exist. The deletion, protection, and move log for the page are provided below for reference."

This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/152109463

Si puó rimuovere il nome anche da: way/832329838
"stagno / kal"?

node/11099347605

ma c'é davvero una palestra qui?

Un parcheggio con 0 posti? Cosa intendevi?

I don't think it was an arrogant message. However, I agree it would be a good idea to contact local users, especially in cases like this where a highway=construction is mapped in the immediate surroundings. It's a clear indicator that the situation has recently changed and the imagery could be outdated.

In any case, calling people trolls should be avoided and good faith should be assumed. There's no need to escalate the discussion with such words.

Hi nolalesseico, I wonder what's the reason of using throw-away accounts to revert?

This changeset has been reverted in: changeset/151905964

This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/151884136

It's the second time the name got deleted by two different users, could you try to get in touch with them before re-adding it a third time?

Also could you please reply to other changeset comments, you never did: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=12058187

>> Una mappatura dei sidewalk così è deprecata

Deprecata da chi? Mappare i marciapiedi a parte permette un maggior dettaglio, secondo me non é mai raccomandabile cancellare qualcosa per sostituirlo con qualcos'altro di dettaglio minore.

Hi daevu,

I think you dragged this node by mistake: node/559589596/history

Is this an import? It created lot of disconnected and overlapped highway.

way/1285918059/history
This highway is not connected and overlaps a building

way/1285918748
This is a track inside an airport, it overlaps an already mapped aeroway=taxiway

node/11928191666/history
node/11928192000/history
these nodes are tagless and share the same coordinates, other tagless nodes where added

way/1285918779/history
this way is just weird, it has a "M" shape, it overlaps already mapped highway and is not connected to anything

way/1285918680
this residential partially overlaps a railway

ecc.ecc.

@RedAuburn: has been inaugurated recently, probably is not visible yet in old satellite imagery

Ad esempio, Villa Prati era mappata come una relazione avente un solo membro outer. Inoltre sia l'outer che la relazione erano impostati come inner del multipoligono del farmland circostante, quindi un inner duplicato.

Il numero identificativo del sentiero, ad esempio "910", non va aggiunto come nome delle strade che lo compongono.

Ciao Lola Fox,

secondo me sarebbe meglio evitare di utilizzare highway e waterway come outer di un farmland, é come dire che metà strada e metà corso d'acqua sono campi agricoli, quando invece sono metà asfalto e metà acqua ovviamente, essendo le way disegnate per convenzione al centro delle strade/corsi d'acqua.

In un caso hai addirittura utilizzato un ponte come outer per l'area natural=water, quando questi elementi non dovrebbero avere neanche un nodo in comune non essendo a contatto (il corso d'acqua passa sotto il ponte).

Ciao Gior7,

way/948234492/

ci sono novità? Dopo 3 anni non si vede ancora nulla nelle immagini satellitari

Hi mcliquid,

it's not really nice to receive a Osmcha downvote for an error made in good faith (forget to manually update StreetComplete). Could you please consider removing it? I understand the importance of informing new users about guidelines, but it feels less rewarding to active and experienced contributors who volunteer their time to the project to receive a thumb down.

node/5044200366/history

this has start_date=180x, what's the meaning? Could it be start_date=C19?