Procedendo a nord, oltre Pozzallo, si trovano dei guidepost 617 che coincidono con il sentiero di caivarallo.it

Mentre non sono sicuro esistano guidepost 617 a sud di Verzimo, dove il sentiero di caivarallo.it si interrompe

Hi Map-Finder,

way/1274789150

please, as someone already told you, do not add fake objects to the database

Hi Der Troisdofer,

something went wrong with some trees, 90 of them have circumference=0, could you take a look at them? https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1KhT

thanks and good mapping

Ciao, per favore non re-inserire i nomi alle colonnine, vedi: https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-it/2022-October/074476.html

Utilizza network:website= https://www.repower.com/it/dina/ invece di website= https://www.repower.com/it/dina/

website=* va utilizzato solo per siti web riguardanti il preciso elemento, in questo caso questa precisa colonnina.

Ciao Michael,

node/11813314156

questo nodo é lo stesso elemento rappresentato da questa area?: way/490918561

Ciao igi77,

node/10926815401/history/2

sei sicuro che questo albero sia Eriobotrya japonica? Wikipedia dice sia un albero sempreverde

Hi ir0nM1ke,

is this really a separate building under an existing building? or is part of the same building? in the second case building:part=yes instead of building=* should be used

Hi tartiflex,

something went wrong with the wikimedia_commons tag, you linked many (around 10) categories that do not exist on Commons.

In this changed you tagged wikimedia_commons=吉野郡, yet such category doesn't exist: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category%3A%E5%90%89%E9%87%8E%E9%83%A1

In another changeset you added =Category:Iwate Prefecture, but that category as well doesn't exist on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Iwate_Prefecture

Generally, if a wikidata=* tag is present, there's no need to add wikimedia_commons since it can be retrieved from it.

Could you check this values and fix them where needed? A tool to find them could be this one: https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/40762

Vedo che dal 2021 ad oggi non é cambiato nulla...
changeset/113906246

Grazie a te per le modifiche!

Ciao Claudev8,

a quanto pare questa panchina non fa parte del network Big Bench Community Project. L'aspetto é differente e non risulta sul sito del progetto.

Qua si legge: https://www.lagendanews.com/val-sangone-anche-coazze-ha-la-sua-big-bench-realizzata-con-il-legno-locale/
"anche Coazze ha la sua Big Bench ma “Fai da te”"

sei d'accordo se tolto i dati relativi al brand?

Hi Landry GAIFFE,

seems like all the imported trees have incorrect circumference=* values. Such as node/9052696963/history with circumference=55. The world record is 43m, so it's likely that the values you imported are in centimeters.

They should all be fixed with circumference=55 cm or circumference=0.55

Also the standard for species is to add the complete name. Example species=Populus nigra instead of species=nigra

*this tree: node/3116858173/history

I just noticed that all these circumference are to be fixed. For istance, this tree has circumference=51 (with the standard unit of measur for this tag being meters), but the greates circumference in the world is 43 meters.

All this imported trees should be fixed adding "cm" at the end of them or converting them to meters such circumference=0.51 instead of circumference=51

I counted at least 12444 trees with values >43 in Bruxelles, which can't be.

Mi ha tradito l'ora tarda e la stanchezza, grazie per la correzione!

Hm, I read now in the last block: "20 february 2024: This block is now lifted under the condition that errors are restored!"

So I guess the errors aren't restored yet based on what you told me.

Hi CatRBLX,

what's the source of this geometry?
way/1240875738/history

In the imagery you used, Bing Maps Aerial, no building is visible.

I once used fee=included for a similar case. I remember I raised this problem here: https://t.me/OpenStreetMapOrg/96365

Seems like you are just "translating" russian names to ukrainian names without any kind of check?
In such case could you discuss these kind of edits with the Italian community (as per guidelines osm.wiki/Automated_Edits_code_of_conduct)?

What's the source of these edits? It doesn't seem like they are survey and local knowledge as stated in the changeset metadata.

Also, let's take an example: node/4690647982
This cafe is called "Bar Mary" and you added the ukrainian name "Слов'янський", which Google translates as "Slavic". What's the meaning of this edit?

Here:
relation/14143259
"Isola delle femmine" has the ukrainian name "Ізола-делле-Фемміне", which doesn't seem ukrainian at all, just the same italian name written in cyrillic ecc.ecc.