What about this other deleted path? changeset/139954314

Ciao Giggio73,

sembra tu stia duplicando degli elementi aggiungendogli questi tag:
full_id=w1197782143
osm_id=1197782143
osm_type=way

riesci a sistemare?

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/139848958.

Yep, not me, just warning you since they didn't and could pass unnoticed. Good mapping!

Hi Yana,

why did you split the roundabout in different sections even if they didn't differ in any way (they have the same tags, the same relations ecc.)?

area=yes è sottinteso da place=square (non esistono place=square disegnati con una way chiusa che non siano aree).

This changeset has been reverted fully or in part by changeset/139830631.

"contact:facebook=Fb.com" is an invalid value tho

other contacts link to a person, not to the contact page of an hotel

how did you verified this entry?

A giudicare da altri commenti ricevuti è piu' probabile che non esista in quella posizione: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=15211144

La piazza era "duplicata" per permettere il routing.

Hi qihuan0913,

welcome to OSM. Please use meaningful changeset comments, "1" doesn't help other users to understand what you did.

See: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi Nonikoff, thanks for the edit!

If that land is used by an hotel it should be landuse=commercial and not landuse=residential tho

Try deleting your browser's cache. Also notice that some kind of shops are not rendered at all in Carto, such as craft=photographer I guess.

Yes, volevo correggere ora che sono arrivato a casa ma vedo che hai già provveduto, gracias

Hi PP69, thanks for the edit and welcome to OSM

does this hotel have a name? is it http://hotel-prinz.at/?

HI Fred,

you added the same hotel twice, while a third (older) hotel was already mapped on the building. Please be careful to not add duplicated (or triplicates like in this case)

HI Fred,

seems like the hotel was already mapped as an area: way/88376351/history

Grazie a te! Buon mapping

Ciao gion274,

so che è un CS vecchio di 5 anni ma vedo che sei ancora attivo, quindi forse riesci a rispondere a questa nota?
note/1694112

Why did you add back building=yes to the museum relation?

The buildings are already tagged on the correspettive 3 buildings:
1. relation/1691910/history
2. way/1111783175/history
3. way/25958413/history

this creates another building, so 4 instead of 3 (as it is in reality). Also the building ignores the inners creating problems in the rendering.

What's this untagged way?
way/1159473634/history

Why you changed this building:part to building? Also you duplicated the name of the museum on this building part:
way/123817514/history

way/1111783175/history
here also you duplicated tourism=museum on the building that is part of a tourism=building relation. Also area=yes is superfluous when the element is a building.

ecc.ecc.
Maybe Go Map!! isn't the best tool to handle such complicated features.