This changeset has been reverted here: changeset/154623228

Oh nevermind, I think I found the reason here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Log?page=File%3A%22Bike_Parade%22_mural_at_Atria_Park_District%2C_Mandurriao%2C_Iloilo_City.jpg&wpFormIdentifier=logeventslist

The file was deleted with the following reason: "Copyright violation: No Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines"

I'm gonna remove the commons tag then

Hi GOwin, the wikimedia commons file linked here: node/11980858326
does not exist on Wikimedia Commons. Maybe there's a typo somewhere in the file name? Could you take a look?

thanks and good mapping!

Ciao Ezio, hai ripristinato il landuse ma come =commercial invece che =retail. Era voluto o é stato un errore?

Hi fthierygeo,

please notice that wikimedia_commons=* has a syntax to follow (e.g. File:xyz.jpg instead of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:xyz.jpg),

Also you used wikimedia_commons:path=*, but according the wiki is used to "Draws a line over specified wikimedia_commons=* image." (this tag was created by a user to map climbing paths). Was this a mistake?

Hi Fehlerbeseitiger,

you replaced the wikimedia_commons=* value (that was pointing to a Wikimedia Commons file) with an image from https://wuerzburgwiki.de/.

wikimedia_commons=* is to be used with files from https://commons.wikimedia.org/ only

for images from other websites the image=* tag can be used

good mapping!

Hi Map47, thanks for your fixes, but I don't think the points Odra_99 raised are entirely wrong.

Here, the western half of the sidewalk you mapped has quite an offset; it goes over the parked cars. The situation is clearer in Esri Clarity, which I suggest you use for edits in Italy over Mapbox Satellite in most cases.

In the other changeset, Odra pointed out that there was no grass in reality. You replied about the multipolygon fix, but the grass addition wasn't needed to correct that problem.

@Odra, se possibile non cancellare edifici per poi ridisegnarli, questo fa perdere la storia dell'elemento: osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
Starei particolarmente attento poi a cancellare edifici importati dal comune di Palermo (source=Comune di Palermo) e col mapping dei multipoligoni (che é ciò che Map47 sta cercando di sistemare).

Hi nik994,

the image linked at this node doesn't exist: node/1918797060

the same problem with:

File:Cycling_guidepost_Serbia_Eurovelo_11_-_ref_1981.jpg

File:Cycling_guidepost_Serbia_Eurovelo_11_-_ref_1980.jpg

File:Cycling_guidepost_Serbia_Eurovelo_11_-_ref_1960.jpg

File:Cycling_guidepost_Serbia_Eurovelo_11_-_ref_1950.jpg

File:Cycling_guidepost_Serbia_Eurovelo_11_-_ref_1910.jpg

could you take a look at them?

Il tipo di strisce si può mappare con crossing:markings=*

This changeset has been reverted by way/28303921

May I encourage you to engage with the broader community so to avoid edit warring? See also: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-discussion-comments?uid=2690560

Ciao Homer9742,

grazie per le modifiche. Potresti però inserire commenti ai changeset che spieghino cosa hai fatto (anche a grandi linee)? Leggi per maggiori informazioni: osm.wiki/IT:Good_changeset_comments

buon mapping

Ciao Kacamino,

grazie per la modifica! Se questi alberi sono Sakura si potrebbe anche aggiungere il tag species="Prunus serrulata"

buon mapping!

La relazione della via francigena tra San Germano Vercellese e Vercelli.

questa é la relazione ora: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1OlQ
questa era la relazione dopo la mia modifica (passa per Montonero): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1OlS
questa la relazione prima di questo changeset (passava per la strada chiusa nel 2021, che mi aveva portato a fare il sopralluogo, quindi era sbagliata anche questa): https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1OlV

Hi chuchupe,

you changed a house to a monument but you give it an invalid wikidata value: way/804083255/history

is it a name? a description? something else?
could you take a look at it?

thanks and good mapping

Il percorso della via Francigena lo avevo aggiornato io il febbraio 2023 (il tracciato ufficiale é stato modificato nel 2021 circa): changeset/132461055
dopo averlo percorso anche a piedi qualche volta, es.: @ivanbranco/traces/6268251

tra l'altro quando crearono quella traccia sul sito ufficiale utilizzarono il routing OSM se non ricordo male, e all'epoca un collegamento non era ancora stato mappato, quindi la versione aggiornata su OSM dopo sopralluogo era perfino piú precisa di quella ufficiale. io ripristinerei quella versione se non ci sono stati sopralluoghi successivi al mio

Hi rupertmaesglas,

was correct before. wikimedia_commons=* files have a syntax to be followed as wiki. In this case it should be "wikimedia_commons=File:Glogfach Lead Mine.jpg", not "wikimedia_commons=https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Glogfach Lead Mine.jpg"

is the same logic we apply to wikidata (we tag =Q123, not =https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q123 and wikipedia (we tag =en:Example, not =https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Example)

Hi Hjart, thanks for the edits!

please notice that wikimedia_commons=* values have a syntax to be followed, I fixed it here: changeset/154004800

good mapping

Hi Ozdemirtahaa

node/12016515259/

the mapillary=* value is a OSM link, not a mapillary id
wikimedia_commons=* values have a syntax to be followed as wiki
wikipedia=* as well

node/8282319807/
here you connected a wood and a highway to a boundary, please don't. Otherwise if someone moves the wood/highway they would move the boundary as well

In cosa consistono queste attrazioni? É qualcosa di verificabile sul campo?

Hi WieKo68,

imho if you don't know a value is okay to not add such tag. E.g. wikimedia_commons=x, wikidata=-- or ref:inspire=-