I would like to understand better this case because I can see the intersection as it follows: between the left turn lane and the other lanes there is only a hash without any physical divider. In my opinion I think this should be mapped without link, only with lane information on the trunk.

Hello! I have seen that way id 631800366 that you have added is a duplicate of way id 38938677. I have tried to delete it but I am receiving conflicts due to other edits that you have made. Can you take a look at it and correct it? Otherwise you can revert the changeset. Thanks!

Hello! I have seen that in the area you have changed several ways from motorway to motorway_link keeping their names. According to the wiki page (osm.wiki/Highway_link), the links do not have names and I am wondering why have you decided to keep them.

Please check the oneway tag that you have added for the following ways: 204158479, 611456780 and 611456779.

Hello! I have seen that you have added oneway:both for several ways. According to the wiki page (oneway=*) this values does not exist for the oneway tag. Please correct them or revert your changeset. Thanks!

I've noticed that for way/17171665 you have added destination:Bristol. What is the source of your edit? As I cannot see this information on the Mapillary track.

I have noticed that for way/17172426 you have added destination:ref:to. What is the source of your edit? As I did not see this information on the Mapillary track.

Hello! I have deleted some of your relations which were not needed due to the existence of a dual carriageway. But what is the source that you have been using for adding relation/8431265?

Hello! I saw that you have added way/583399327 without any tag. Please correct it.

I am wondering why have you changed way/143497387 and way/184849303 from secondary to primary.

What is the source of your edits and what is the reason behind the fact that the ways are not connected with Oakes Street Southwest and Cherry Street Southwest?

If you are having some collected images or gpx tracks, I guess it would be a good idea that in the future you would mention them as source because it is very confusing to verify the satellite images in order to check the edits. Thanks!

Hello! What is the source of your edits? As I cannot see these roads on any of the satellite images that you have mentioned.

I've noticed that you have changed the access of the roads only on one side. Aren't they both with access=yes? Also, does the bridge has its own name? Isn't it called "South 1st Street"?

Hello!
I saw that at this changeset you have added a new restriction (7882915). Can you please tell me the source of your edit? Also, please be aware that a restriction should have three members, not two. For further information, read here: osm.wiki/Relation:restriction

Hello, IanH!

I saw that you have added the tag bridge:yes for way/11634236. May I know the source of your edit?

Thank you.

Kind regards,
Ioana.

Hello!

Thank you for your comment. The turn restriction has been added based on an internal survey.

Regards,
Ioana.

Hello!

Thank you for your feedback. I have double checked my edits and I have edited according to your suggestions.

Kind regards,
Ioana.

I have worked on a specific data set and I have accidentally uploaded it. But I have deleted everything that has mistakenly been uploaded. Now it should be fine.

Hello!
Sorry, it was my mistake. I have changed and uploaded the tags according to the OSM database.