imroy's Comments
| Post | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Download openstreetmap 0.1 ? | What do you mean by a "windows download"?
|
|
| the route | Spam - link in profile. |
|
| Do Skin Lotion Products Work? | Stupid spam |
|
| There's too much spam in the OSM Diaries | It seems to have all been removed now. Clearly something needs to be done about spam now. |
|
| cialis without prescription | Wow, now that's some spam! |
|
| - | spam in profile |
|
| Austin | spam - link in profile. |
|
| Voip providers | spam |
|
| Buy Acai Berry | So very spammy. A simple Bayesian filter would have picked this one. |
|
| Self Improvement | Spam - links in user profile. |
|
| Roger's New Diary | spam |
|
| Business | spam |
|
| VJ Worshop | spam? |
|
| Tank works supplier | Spam |
|
| A Review of Popular River Rafting Trips and Services | Spam |
|
| All You Need To Know About Skydiving | Spam |
|
| OSM getting blasted, time to blast back | Were the comments always closed on that post? I wonder what sort of responses this idiot got. It's just a scare piece from a Washington lobbying group. |
|
| Increase the speed of rendering for Haiti | But I've never viewed that part of the OSM map before I followed your link. So I can't have had those tiles in my browser cache. The OSM server gave me old tiles, then gave me new tiles when I shift-reloaded them. Was this because it took the server longer than 3 seconds to render each new tile, as amm described? |
|
| Increase the speed of rendering for Haiti | I checked that first link. Indeed "Enes" was on its own. Then I switched through the different renders and it showed up as a building (except Cycle Map is blank for some reason). I switched back to Mapnik and it then appeared as a building. The funny thing is that I closed the tab, reopened it, and had exactly the same experience. I've since opened the individual tiles in my browser:
|
|
| DCDB skew | The discrepancies are interesting. Perhaps the positions are made in relation to the Australian Geodetic Datum (AGD66). Australia is moving north-ish at something like 5-7 cm a year, but it would take well over 100 years to move 8-10 m. So I'm not sure what could be causing it. Maybe it's just laziness or sloppiness. |