Hi henreemash,

Please note that you do not need to append the names of bus routes with their route number. That's what the `ref`=* key is for. Adding "304" to the name of the Max Yellow routes is totally superfluous. That goes for any and all bus routes.

I don't want to dissuade you from contributing to the map, just trying to warn you that these sorts of edits aren't correct.

Thanks for your contributions!

Why did you delete the Inuktitut and French names from Devon Island and Baillie-Hamilton Island? Especially the Inuktitut, given about 90% of Nunavummiut speak Inuit languages...?

I've re-added the chess board, see changeset/158682968. Please don't delete it again.

Uh, excuse me: yes there frickin' is a a giant chess board there. >:(

You had already added this supermarket, node/12101056439; changeset/155031279

I have since deleted this node.

I should be clear: I replaced the "service:vehicle:a/c_recharge=yes" tag with "service:vehicle:air_conditioning=yes" so that there's no confusion about this fixme note again.

Also added detail to the parking lot/alley in behind the old library & Police Admin buildings.

*Prince's Island Estates, not Eau Claire Estates

(to-may-to, to-mah-to...)

Thanks for adding these, Minh. :)

I don't know speak Chinese (or any other language that may historically/incidentally use Han characters), so wasn't very confident about adding the names in Chinese. (Whereas e.g. changeset/128536413 I had public online sources from the City of Calgary to simply copy-paste the characters from.)

Hi Andrew,

You seem to have pulled these nodes:
- node/21090802
- node/156900270
- node/2146618559
- node/2146618569
- node/2242331674

... in Toronto all out of whack. Seems unrelated to your changes in Calgary. I've since tried my best to fix it. (see changeset/157683486)

Hi Andrew, FYI the road ways you added in this change seem to have been duplicates of existing ones already on the map. I presume you were trying to fix the connectivity of the #9 Dalhousie bus route, and JOSM mistakenly generated new ways rather than adding the existing ones to the relation.

I've since fixed it. (See changeset/157593048)

Just wanted to let you know, to keep a lookout as you continue to make sure it's not adding copies of road ways on top of existing ones.

Thanks!

:/

You should have fixing the tagging here, rather than deleted the alley. I have since re-added it. Please be more careful in future.

Hi Callem,

Please note that the roads you changed the access tagging to were already tagged `access=no`. This means that public access is strictly prohibited, so you really didn't need to change this. Please see access=*.

Thanks!

"disused:shop=yes" seems like a silly tag to use here, it's a disused architect's office space on the top floor of a historic building.

Sorry, change leisure=park, not *landuse*. Anyway...

I know there's a warning here for using the barrier=block tags on two line ways in lieu of node points, but I don't know of any better tagging to use in such a situation. In reality what's there is two courses of these types of interlocking concrete blocks: https://concrete-security-barriers.co.uk/lg-interlocking-concrete-barrier/

... plus a metal fence on top of it. The fence and the blocks are partially contiguous, but not entirely, which is why I mapped them as separate ways.

If someone has a better idea of what to do, feel free to change it!

Hello feathered_ouul,

I noticed you've made a number of changes across Western Canada recently, with the changeset comment as per above: "A number of node changes."

Can you please be more specific? At a cursory glance you seem to be making changes such as adding or fixing wikidata tags to businesses, updating bus stop tags and the like, but also many changes to areas & ways (e.g. buildings & pedestrian crossings) which aren't immediately clear.

Thanks!

Hi Caidyn,

Can you please add changeset comments to elaborate on what you're doing? Please see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments.

With respect to this sidewalk you edited in this changeset, I can tell you with 100% certainty that the `bicycle=yes` tagging is inappropriate. City of Calgary Traffic Bylaw 26M96 paragraph 42(1)(c) prohibits bicycles from being ridden on sidewalks. There are exceptions for children under the age of 14 and for newspaper carriers, but otherwise it's generally not allowed.

Thanks!

Is it really *under construction* though...? I think it's a bit specious to say it is. There's some earthworks going on in Ogden, and there are some utilities relocation projects going on downtown, but the railway line itself is still not under construction. They're not even done detailed design yet.

Hello Whoabot,

Going forward can you please split these sorts of changesets into two? Grouping changes made in Alaska with changes made almost 3000 km away in Manitoba makes it very difficult for others to parse the changes you've made.

Please see osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets for more info.

Thanks!