OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
57298836 almost 8 years ago

Please stop reverting my correct mapping of boundaries as relations: osm.wiki/Relation:boundary . I did not remove any information. Mapping boundaries as relations is state-of-the-art, especially if adjacent boundaries share a common border. You can keep redundant tags on the ways if you like, but stop reverting the topologically correct mapping of the boundary ways (as part of the relations). This is an enhancement - not a "bad removal of tagging".

57229235 almost 8 years ago

Why did you revert my changeset? I have not removed a single tag. There is no "less specific tagging".

43856495 over 8 years ago

Thanks for advice. I fixed the typos.

45996283 almost 9 years ago

Thanks for the note. I fixed it.

33284218 over 9 years ago

Yes, my fault. Thanks for pointing out.

33284218 over 9 years ago

Which node are you talking about?

37248167 almost 10 years ago

Danke für die Korrektur. Sollte natürlich "service" sein. Tiger ist ja häufig ungenau und veraltet. Im ersten Durchgang passe ich oft erstmal nur die Wegeklasse an.

35397936 about 10 years ago

Yes, I'm fast at fixing MPs! ;)

35031911 about 10 years ago

I tested the JOSM plugin "tofix". It chooses the bugs randomly worldwide. As I did not commit every single fix, the changes of the CS are distributed worldwide. Otherwise I would never commit such an edit. The comment "#to-fix:highwayhighway" was also set by this plugin (for the case "crossing highways") - i should have changed it. I won't use this plugin in the future anyhow...

33588831 over 10 years ago

Bitte etwas aufpassen, da du way/227603428 einfach um ein paar 100 Meter verschoben hattest. Habe es korrigiert. (partial revert: changeset/33616944)

32086301 over 10 years ago

I have reverted this CS [changeset/33588206], as it inserted a translated copy of the road network of "Krum"... Why did you do this?

32171752 over 10 years ago

Why did you drop this admin boundary?

32171480 over 10 years ago

Edit: reverted with changeset/32183643.

32171480 over 10 years ago

Why did you just dropped this admin boundary? (reverted with changeset/32171480)

30429326 over 10 years ago

Hi, in this CS you added small Islands to Relation "Corvo" (relation/1753242) - that's ok. But why did you remove the main island of Corvo and added it to the relation "Flores" (relation/1753243)?

30387203 over 10 years ago

Please don not remove admin boundaries without reason. I have reverted this change set...

30347796 over 10 years ago

e.g. just closing a gap of a few meters

19917977 almost 11 years ago

Dann ist das nach dem Railway-Schema "railway=razed". "historic=*" gibt nur die "historische Relevanz" an, nicht den phsyischen Zustand. Hab es mal korrigiert, s. changeset/28631495 .

28148202 almost 11 years ago

Why did you remove the admin boundary? You destroyed the admin multipolygon! I have reverted the removal of the admin boundary.

26775129 about 11 years ago

Hi! I am fixing admin multipolygon errors. For details look in to the change sets.