hofoen's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 57298836 | almost 8 years ago | Please stop reverting my correct mapping of boundaries as relations: osm.wiki/Relation:boundary . I did not remove any information. Mapping boundaries as relations is state-of-the-art, especially if adjacent boundaries share a common border. You can keep redundant tags on the ways if you like, but stop reverting the topologically correct mapping of the boundary ways (as part of the relations). This is an enhancement - not a "bad removal of tagging". |
| 57229235 | almost 8 years ago | Why did you revert my changeset? I have not removed a single tag. There is no "less specific tagging". |
| 43856495 | over 8 years ago | Thanks for advice. I fixed the typos. |
| 45996283 | almost 9 years ago | Thanks for the note. I fixed it. |
| 33284218 | over 9 years ago | Yes, my fault. Thanks for pointing out. |
| 33284218 | over 9 years ago | Which node are you talking about? |
| 37248167 | almost 10 years ago | Danke für die Korrektur. Sollte natürlich "service" sein. Tiger ist ja häufig ungenau und veraltet. Im ersten Durchgang passe ich oft erstmal nur die Wegeklasse an. |
| 35397936 | about 10 years ago | Yes, I'm fast at fixing MPs! ;) |
| 35031911 | about 10 years ago | I tested the JOSM plugin "tofix". It chooses the bugs randomly worldwide. As I did not commit every single fix, the changes of the CS are distributed worldwide. Otherwise I would never commit such an edit. The comment "#to-fix:highwayhighway" was also set by this plugin (for the case "crossing highways") - i should have changed it. I won't use this plugin in the future anyhow... |
| 33588831 | over 10 years ago | Bitte etwas aufpassen, da du way/227603428 einfach um ein paar 100 Meter verschoben hattest. Habe es korrigiert. (partial revert: changeset/33616944) |
| 32086301 | over 10 years ago | I have reverted this CS [changeset/33588206], as it inserted a translated copy of the road network of "Krum"... Why did you do this? |
| 32171752 | over 10 years ago | Why did you drop this admin boundary? |
| 32171480 | over 10 years ago | Edit: reverted with changeset/32183643. |
| 32171480 | over 10 years ago | Why did you just dropped this admin boundary? (reverted with changeset/32171480) |
| 30429326 | over 10 years ago | Hi, in this CS you added small Islands to Relation "Corvo" (relation/1753242) - that's ok. But why did you remove the main island of Corvo and added it to the relation "Flores" (relation/1753243)? |
| 30387203 | over 10 years ago | Please don not remove admin boundaries without reason. I have reverted this change set... |
| 30347796 | over 10 years ago | e.g. just closing a gap of a few meters |
| 19917977 | almost 11 years ago | Dann ist das nach dem Railway-Schema "railway=razed". "historic=*" gibt nur die "historische Relevanz" an, nicht den phsyischen Zustand. Hab es mal korrigiert, s. changeset/28631495 . |
| 28148202 | almost 11 years ago | Why did you remove the admin boundary? You destroyed the admin multipolygon! I have reverted the removal of the admin boundary. |
| 26775129 | about 11 years ago | Hi! I am fixing admin multipolygon errors. For details look in to the change sets. |