What needs to be fixed here way/420133647? Please specify. fixme=yes is no good use...

Maybe you can check on the French forum / mailinglists about the status of that idea. I just asked on the German forum to see if anybody knows anything there. Thank you for your answers anyway! I'll let you know what they say over here :-)

Thank you :-)

Hello and thanks for your quick reply!

Then this seems to be a "french only" way of tagging things. The discussion about having duplicate adresses is still going on, and although I (and I guess all other mappers) would love to have a general consent on such a basic issue, there is no consent yet.

The first link you sent leads to a draft, which has not been voted on nor has it been approved in any way, as far as I can see. So I don't think this should be used in everyday tagging.

In my opinion it only makes sense to apply such a serious change in tagging worldwide and not only in one country. Do you know if there has been a discussion on that in any international mailing list or forum?

Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

Is there any aim to adapt the OSM tagging scheme for this large import?

All the best,

highflyer74

Hello there!

Is the ctry=140 required? It does not seem to be an established OSM key=value combination...

Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

All the best,

highflyer74

Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

All the best,

highflyer74

Hello Andy!

What does the key "accesland" in these ways (way/419026104 + way/419026106) mean? Maybe fingertrouble...?

Greets from across the Channel!

Hello!

Please make sure to cleanup tags according to OSM tagging scheme (e.g. not using capital letters etc). Thank you!

Hello there!

Just curious, what is meant by "ingress" in this case way/419490495 ? So far this is the only key used in OSM. Any idea to tag it according to wiki?

Hello and welcome to OSM!

I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database.

For example "Infra" and "Institución" are not valid OSM keys. Please keep in mind not to use capital letters.

All the best,

highflyer74

Hello!

Please make sure to cleanup tags according to OSM tagging scheme (e.g. not using capital letters etc). Thank you!

Hello!

I noticed you changed some address data to contact:postcode etc. This is wrong. The initial version was correct. contact:* is used for phone, website etc.

Happy mapping!

Hello!

Welcome to OSM! Please keep in mind not to use capital letters with standard keys / values. Also watch out for typos...

Happy mapping!

Moin Berti!

Willkommen bei OSM! Ich habe gesehen, daß Du fleissig Gebäude hinzufügt hast, und möchte ein paar Tipps dazu loswerden.

Es ist sehr gut, daß Du mit JOSM arbeitest, denn der hilft Dir bei vielen Dingen, die bei iD (dem eingebauten Editor) einfach fehlen. Wenn Du ein Gebäude einzeichnest, kannst Du danach "q" drücken, damit die Form rechtwinklig wird. Es gibt auch ein Plugin mit dem Namen "BuildingsTools". Dieses erleichtert die Arbeit nocheinmal. Dann fiel mir noch auf, daß Du die Häuser meist als "house" deklarierst. Das ist schon einmal besser als das allgemeine "yes". Ich würde aber empfehlen, gleich die genaue Bezeichnung zu nehmen. Also "detached" für ein freistehendes EFH, "house" für Doppelhaushälften oder einzelne Reihenhäuser usw. (building=*). Bei Reihenhäusern, die nicht unterteilt sind (wo nur der Gesamtumriß eingezeichnet ist), nimmt man "terrace". Ach ja: das Plugin "terracer" ist hervorragend zum Unterteilen von Häusern geeignet. Man gibt einfach die Anzahl der Unterteilungen an, und bekommt gleichgroße geliefert.

Wenn Du noch Fragen hast, einfach melden!

Gruss aus HB!

Ach, entschuldige, das hatte ich nicht gesehen.

Thanks for the quick reply! As I am mainly mapping things and doing quite a bit of quality assurance, I am not that involved in the different ways to display data. I remember uMap (https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/) being mentioned in forums as an easy solution. With the Overpass Turbo (https://overpass-turbo.eu/) you can set up different (also quite complex) queries to display the data you need. When it comes to programming things Leaflet (http://leafletjs.com/) seems to be popular. If that does not help, try the UK OSM forum (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=5), and if there is no help there try the German one (http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewforum.php?id=14).

I hope this is of help. If you don't need the data anymore, just keep in mind to remove it again latest by then.

All the best from across the Channel!

Tach!

Mmmmh, mit blind:blindenfuehrhund kann glaube ich keine Software etwas anfangen. Ich würde da eher in Richtung blind:guide_dog o.ä. gehen, da die Datenbank ja weltweit gilt. Gibt es da schon etwas im Wiki?

Gruß aus HB!

Hello!

Can the "COMPARTSNO" key be removed? This does not really comply with OSM documentation...