OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
55664027 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55664027

55663757 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55663757

55663952 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55663952

55197436 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55197436

55197105 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55197105

55196948 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55196948

55196089 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55196089

55195876 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55195876

55198524 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55198524

55198855 almost 8 years ago

Hello!
I reviewed your changeset on OSMCha and it looks great!
Thank you very much for your contributions to OpenStreetMap!
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/55198855

53593921 about 8 years ago

Nice one Rory, I'm still getting to grips with some of the tools and plugins available. Which "untagged ways in the middle" are you referring to? Thanks

54417635 about 8 years ago

Hi aharvey, thanks for getting in touch. I had a look on the OSM contributor page, and this looks to be compatible with the guidelines explained there. osm.wiki/Contributors#Australia To confirm, would [email protected] the right place to get clarification on the license? Here was the source from where I got the data as well http://qldspatial.information.qld.gov.au/catalogue/custom/search.page?q=%22Queensland Thanks again

54417635 about 8 years ago

Hi David, thanks for reaching out to confirm. I found the license here - osm.wiki/Attribution/qld.data.gov.au_explicit_permission. Please me know if the wiki needs to be updated or another change in License has occured. Cheers, Oisin

53989293 about 8 years ago

Hi Aaronsta,
Thanks for the feedback. I left my earlier comment before seeing your explanation. In terms of looking at the most up todate tile set for an area, is there somewhere to check the age of the tile assets? I right click on the tile for info, but am not finding any dates to verify earliest aerial imagery asset. Cheers

53989819 about 8 years ago

Hi aaronsta, not long on the OSM editing so wanted to ask was I incorrect to adjust intersection on Collier road using Strava heatmap and ESRI imagery? Thanks, it will help to avoid any future errors on my part

53465104 about 8 years ago

It was an incorrect use of 'privacy' on my part. While it is private property, there was no attached information which would casue concern, so I was incorrect to remove the buildings. thanks.