OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

hackthemap's Notes

Notes submitted or commented on by hackthemap

Id Creator Description Created at Last changed
2168881 ITNosm

Diese FB wurden demontiert !
2183982 Heinz93

"Rewe Tiefgarage wurde doppelt erfasst"
The place has gone or never existed. This is an auto-generated note from MAPS.ME application: a user reports a POI that is visible on a map (which can be outdated), but cannot be found on the ground.
POI has no name
POI types: amenity-parking-no-access amenity-parking-underground
OSM data version: 2020-04-02T17:07:40Z
#mapsme
2037174 bowfinger26

Shop on ground floor, retirement home on upper floors.

via StreetComplete 15.0
1500299 hackthemap

building tag wrong?
If it is an ehemalige Güterhalle / former hall for goods (and always was before) and given its size it is unlikely it was constructed as a shed and thus the building type dosn't match the outline and name tag
2238532 tishbh

“Hi,
On the basis of our driver feedback and cross verifying it with private street imagery, I found the following issue to exist in this location. Since the street imagery is older, I would like to check if the issue still exist in this location. If you are going to survey or have local knowledge of this vicinity, please make necessary changes in OSM.

Issue : speed restriction sign board
Location : 50.2955051, 8.2499135
Proof : speed limit sign board(2018) of 10kmph
Correction: Modify speed restriction on service road.

Regards,
Tishbh
2234515 mounicb

“Hi,
On the basis of our driver feedback and cross verifying it with private street imagery, I found the following issue to exist in this location. Since the street imagery is older, I would like to check if the issue still exist in this location. If you are going to survey or have local knowledge of this vicinity, please make necessary changes in OSM.

Issue : Height restriction
Location : 50.1106238, 8.7491892
Proof : 'Height restriction of 3.3 m' Sign board (2016) near node node/3131603342
Correction: Add " maxheight=3.3 " to driveway (way/307921198)

Regards,
mounicb
1393194 28MzXP5-_uXH

TODO: The other two artificial lakes are missing
2205051 hackthemap

Multiple housenumbers missing around here
2028480 hackthemap

"Has wifi from neighboring store and from skyline plaza, marketed as woman's store, don't know address but maps app doesn't allow to remove street, located in skyline plaza on ground level (osm level 0)"
POI name: Only
POI types: shop-clothes internet_access-wlan
OSM data version: 2019-09-12T13:51:09Z
#mapsme
2173593 hackthemap

The small segment ( way/766288725 ) between the combined bike/footpath and the Sonnemannstraße is tagged as oneway without it being allowed for bicycles to use in the opposite direction towards the south.
But the longer segment of Rückerstraße above ( way/147690832 ) it ( and the wohle other part of Rückerstraße) is tagged as usable for bicycles in the opposite direction.
It would not make sense that these two are different!

So, is the whole Rückerstraße (at least beginning from Ostendstraße) leading into Sonnemannstraße allowed for bicycles in the opposite direction or is it also only oneway for bicycles?