Klar hat der Turm node/2428032671 nur ein Stockwerk, aber lohnt es sich, das im Namen festzuhalten?

Weder node/8718474142/ noch way/189122654 ist ‘Fleisch & Wurst’, hast du die Änderung noch nicht hochgeladen?

Subi.
Ich das 'name=Freeheeler's' von der Hausecke aufs ganze Haus transferiert, dann sollte der Name auch im Standard-Layer auf OSM auftauchen.

Weisst du, ob die Metzgerei noch da ist oder nicht?
Ich hab' diese mal in einen eigenen POI verschoben: node/8718474142/

(Die Webseite der Metzgerei scheint nicht mehr zu funktionieren)

Your bogus changeset has been reverted.

changeset/104456870

changeset/104456870

In this changeset you've removed the administrative boundary from way/361796343/

You're keeping on destroying OpenStreetMap data, please refrain from doing so.

I reverted your changes, please take care in edting OpenStreetMap in the future.

You have added 'name=road' to the administrative border way/361796343/history in this changeset.
I removed the name, since this is no road, but a river (way/152820642/history)

Also you've added node/8672174553 as a railway crossing and node/8672174554/ as a motorway junction.
This is entirely senseless, I removed both these nodes (e.g. the tags on these nodes).

Hey!
You've changed way/935853161/ from water/pond to a building and way/265488401/ from residential highway to motorway
Please refrain from disimproving changes by other users, OpenStreetMap is a collaborative project.
I reverted your changes.

Hey bmillz21

Since you've requested a review in this changeset; It would be helpful if you add square buildings to the map, if they really show up square/rectanglar in the available imagery.
You can do this by pressing the 'q' key on your keyboard, as explained here: https://learnosm.org/en/hot-tips/tracing-rectangular-buildings/

Happy mapping and greetings from Switzerland,
habi

Only after investigating a bit further I found that you simply drew over the way that was drawn by another user some days ago: way/940079219/history
I removed *your* way and left the earlier one.

Here you've added several bicycle parkings which I removed now.
Again, please don't add bogus data to OpenStreetMap, you're not helping anyone with this!

Also here, you're adding bogus data: way/940682820, this is definitefely *not* an asphalt road where one can drive 90 km/h.
I deleted your additions from this changeset in this changeset: changeset/104454571

I also cleaned up way/850595517.

All this in my changeset changeset/104454290

way/940689300/ was drawn over an already present building, with the incorrect tag 'height=111', which would correspond to a more than 100 m tall building.
Please don't add bogus data to OpenStreetMap, this is *not* helping anyone.
I removed this building.

You've added way/940689302/ with only name and description.
I've changed it to `highway=residential`
In the source comments you mention 'local knowledge', are you from the region?

Ciao Anja
Since you've requested a review here: You have added way/940689301/ with 'name=f', 'oneway=yes', 'maxspeed=90' and 'surface=asphalt' in this changeset.

This doesn't seem to make sense to me, as the highway doesn't seem to have an asphalt surface and I think that no-one will be able to drive 90 km/h on this track.

I removed some of your tags and aligned the highway to the imagery.

Please take care to tag your additions to the map as accurately as possible.

Happy mapping,
habi

Dies alles habe ich im Changeset changeset/104453139 gemacht.