OpenStreetMap
habi's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 101627406 | almost 5 years ago | Hey KhaledN
Greetings from Switzerland and happy mapping,
PS: I came here from https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm
|
| 101649872 | almost 5 years ago | Hey! In this changeset you've added several ways tagged as `nnat=w`, which seems like a typo to me: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/15ox Did you mean to tag these as `natural=water`?
PS: I came here via https://osm.mueschelsoft.de/taginfo/newkeys.htm |
| 101621476 | almost 5 years ago | Welcome to OpenStreetMap It would be good if the comment of your changeset describes what you actually changed and is not just some random sequence of characters. Happy mapping and greetings from Switzerland,
|
| 101622360 | almost 5 years ago | Ciao Abnm It seems that you're adding bogus data to OpenStreetMap, which is considered vandalism.
I've reverted this changeset with changeset/101706394 |
| 101594884 | almost 5 years ago | way/54969181 is also called 'Holligenstrasse' :) It's very pedantic, but I think that a `highway=service` (highway=service) describes it better than a footway, as there might be cars that can go to the castle, just not the general public, which is taken care of with the `access=private` tag. |
| 101594884 | almost 5 years ago | Additionally, there's already a gate here: node/704367508 so the tag is doubly redundant. |
| 101594884 | almost 5 years ago | Ciao CiroP Hello and welcome to OpenStreetMap, great that you're here! `access=no` is for only for "military or government facilities" (see access=no), maybe `access=private` would be more suited in this case.
Happy to continue the discussion (also in German if that's better). E Gruess usem Liebefeld,
|
| 101553794 | almost 5 years ago | And just so you know for future changes: You can request a review (like you did with this change, that’s why I’m here), then there’s a higher chance that someone else looks at it. |
| 101553794 | almost 5 years ago | No worries, we're all here to make the map better! Me personally especially for bike stuff :) |
| 101553794 | almost 5 years ago | Ciao Zocky17 Welcome to OpenStreetMap, great to have you here. You've changed the road to the cable car (way/473053452/, strangely only named 's') to a driveway, which is generally only used to lead to a property: service=driveway Additionally, you marked it as `covered=yes` which is only to be used if an object is under another object, e.g. a roof or so. Marking `surface=asphalt' would have been enough to tell that this road is good for biking.
Greetings from Bern,
|
| 101271903 | almost 5 years ago | Und: Das Gebäude way/918764797/ ist auf den Bildern 'Kanton Zug 2011' nicht erkennbar.
Gruss aus Bern,
|
| 101271903 | almost 5 years ago | Hey oceane_e
|
| 101445985 | almost 5 years ago | Ciao pkrauer
Wenn ich Öffnungszeiten erfasse, nehme ich meistens https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ zur Hilfe, die Telefonnummern in OSM sollten im internationalen Format, also ohne '(0)' eingetragen werden. Gruss aus Bern,
|
| 101437603 | almost 5 years ago | 👌🏻 |
| 101501847 | almost 5 years ago | Evtl. von der Mondphase :)
|
| 101502527 | almost 5 years ago | Mersi! |
| 101501847 | almost 5 years ago | Thanks!
|
| 101452897 | almost 5 years ago | I took the liberty to correct this in JOSM: changeset/101510001 |
| 101421508 | almost 5 years ago | |
| 101421508 | almost 5 years ago | In this changeset you've added several 'demolised:building's.
Happy mapping,
|