gurglypipe's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 124481529 | over 3 years ago | For anyone following along, please see the discussion on changeset/124420794 |
| 124420794 | over 3 years ago | Hi Richard, I’m not sure what you say is actually true: the way here has explicit foot=yes, horse=yes, bicycle=yes and motor_vehicle=no tagging. So the tagging defaults from highway=bridleway or highway=track are already being overridden. |
| 124217602 | over 3 years ago | OK, I added it in changeset/124397243. :) I see your point about permissive paths not being a legal designation, I’ve seen many paths where foot=permissive is used inappropriately. I hope that adding designation=permissive_footpath would make it clearer that this is actually an infrastructured permissive path and the tagging is correct. |
| 124342306 | over 3 years ago | Great, thanks for clearing that up :) |
| 124342306 | over 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Just checking (because 6.6 tonnes is an unusual weight, and it doesn’t match your changeset comment), did you mean to set the *weight* limit or the *width* limit for this bridge? Thanks! |
| 124323412 | over 3 years ago | (For anyone reviewing this changeset: I’ve checked that the changes in the north-west are OK. I have not checked the south-east.) |
| 124323412 | over 3 years ago | Hi. Please try and keep the geographical size of your changesets to something a bit smaller than the whole of England in future. Almost all of your changes here are in the south-east, apart from Isel Hall — that could have been a separate changeset. Large changeset areas are hard for other contributors to check, and end up notifying a lot of people. See osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets Thanks! |
| 124217602 | over 3 years ago | Should it be tagged as designation=permissive_footpath then, as per designation=*#Permissive_Paths? Or do you mean ‘permissive’ in some other sense? :) |
| 123978729 | over 3 years ago | Hi, if you’re going to tag things as landuse=meadow rather than landuse=farmland, can you please clarify the tagging by adding meadow=pasture to make it clear that these aren’t actual wildflower meadows. There are vanishingly few actual meadows in the north west, and it’s useful to be able to distinguish them from the very common pasture farmland here. Thanks :) |
| 123443108 | over 3 years ago | Nice work! |
| 123392605 | over 3 years ago | Hi, please consider adding more descriptive changeset comments than just “edit”. Doing so helps other local mappers quickly see how your edits aim to change on the map. See osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks |
| 122669717 | over 3 years ago | Hi, are you sure that Knights of Middle England is a swimming pool? Their website seems to be exclusively about jousting. |
| 123146992 | over 3 years ago | Hi, thanks for editing OSM! Please consider writing more explanatory changeset comments when you edit: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments Thanks! |
| 123045064 | over 3 years ago | I’ve made some changes in changeset/123091294, see what you think |
| 123045064 | over 3 years ago | No worries, you seem to be going about things the right way in marking edits as needing review, and being open to discussion :) The restriction about not being able to stay year-round at Westmorland Caravans is an interesting one. I think it’s probably still best to tag the area as landuse=residential, since I’m assuming people’s use/ownership of a static caravan/plot there is typically measured in years, rather than a single weekend as it is in the Caravan Club site. But the note you’ve added about it not being open year-round is a good addition for clarifying things. I’ll edit the land back to landuse=residential. If you want to edit the map to add Woodlands Hotel and Pine Lodges, please do go ahead :) But bear in mind that you cannot use Google Maps as a source of information — only use information from your own in-person surveys or freely-licensed sources. The problem with using Google Maps information is that Google then has a copyright claim (essentially, part ownership) over part of the OpenStreetMap database, and they could use that copyright claim to restrict distribution of OSM. There’s some more information about licensing here, if it’s a topic you’d like to read more about: osm.wiki/FAQ#Why_don't_you_just_use_Google_Maps/whoever_for_your_data? |
| 123066078 | over 3 years ago | Update for anyone else reading this later: the change was reverted as changeset/123088018 Thanks |
| 123066078 | over 3 years ago | Hiya, what was the reasoning behind this change? As far as I know, that road is just a driveway for The Villa, and is not a public road. |
| 123042419 | over 3 years ago | ta :) |
| 123042419 | over 3 years ago | Thanks. I’d actually go with landuse=farmland farmland=pasture rather than landuse=meadow meadow=pasture, since the former is the predominant tagging in the north west at the moment, and is being used by several active mappers. At some point your mapping is going to reach theirs, and there’s going to be a discontinuity. Either tagging would be arguably correct, though, since there’s some wiggle room about it on the wiki. :) |
| 123042419 | over 3 years ago | Hi, can you please not retag landuse=farmland, farmland=pasture as landuse=meadow without adding further qualifiers about the kind of meadow (as the farmland=pasture tag was used)? Very, very few fields in northern England are actual meadows, so I believe use of landuse=meadow is misleading. Almost all of them, used for sheep and cattle grazing, are pasture. Meadows have longer grass and wildflowers and are cut for hay rather than being close-cropped grazed for most or all of the year. |