Good suggestion; fixed in 70581115. I haven’t actually been to the station since seeing that blog post, so can’t yet confirm what other tools are available.

Wow, what a monster edit! Nice one.

Hi, thanks for contributing to OpenStreetMap! Here’s a tip: if you select an area and press ‘s’, the editor will automatically square the corners of the area for you. It’s quite useful when drawing regular buildings. Have fun. :-)

Is this https://www.lakedistrict.gov.uk/aboutus/media-centre/latest-news/news-releases/temporary-buttermere-bridge-to-be-removed2?

Nice work. Did you mean to move the rubbish bin from Ullswater Road?

Hi, welcome to OpenStreetMap, and thanks for your recent edits around Parlick. Note that when you have an area selected in the editor, you can press the ‘s’ key to automatically square up its corners. It’s a particularly easy way of drawing regular buildings. Have fun :-)

Hi, your change of Pikestol Lane to Pikestone Lane caused some OSLMC validation errors:
- https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=589481
- https://ris.dev.openstreetmap.org/oslmusicalchairs/map?osl_id=589482

Would you be able to double check this? My guess is that Pikestone Lane is the correct name, and OSLMC is wrong, but I don’t know what you saw on the ground. The not:name tag is the right way to silence these warnings if they are incorrect.

Ta!

Oops, I missed that bit. Thanks for the fix.

Hey, thanks for replying. It seems like this is a bug in maps.me over-zealously making the same changes. Is your offline map data up to date in the app?

Why revert the change to make the website link HTTPS? The HTTPS version of the website loads fine for me.

Hi, thanks for editing OSM. What’s your source for the name of this tarn? I’ve never heard it had a name before. Thanks.

I see you’ve added the addr:housenumber back again in changeset/68830140. Would you be able to explain your reasoning for this? Have I misunderstood the tagging scheme? Thanks.

Hi, thanks for your recent edits to Grange! Just a note to say that adding names which duplicate the tagging of an area is unnecessary — these areas are already tagged as a football pitch and tennis courts, so don’t need that information duplicated in the name. Ta.

Hi, thanks for adding to OSM. There’s no need to add addr:housenumber to this pet shop, as the unit is tagged using the addr:unit tag, which is more specific. I’ve tweaked it in this edit: changeset/68815334.

🥳

I was updating the existing tagging, but you’re right; that would be a better way of doing things. Done in changeset/68135631.

Hi, thanks for your edits! Would it be more appropriate to tag these residential blocks as something like:
building=apartments
amenity=student_accommodation
addr:housename=Damson
addr:housenumber=79

Then both the house number and name are machine-readable, and it’s clear that this is purpose-built student accommodation.

See:
- osm.wiki/Proposed_features/amenity%3Dstudent_accommodation
- addr=*

While you’re there, maybe you could also map building:levels and building:flats to give an idea of the size of the building? See:
- building:flats=*
- building:levels=*

Thanks!

I wondered if that was the case, but was planning to leave resurveying it until once the construction work’s complete. Thanks for the update! :-)

Nice one.

Hi. I’ve reverted this edit (here: changeset/67879030) because it’s not actually necessary — this footpath is already part of the Dales Way relation (which describes the entire route), which you can see here: relation/29302

Thanks!