Heya, thanks for adding this detail around the Ulverston channel.

What was the source of the data?

I ask because mapping the rocks as rectangular areas seems a bit unnatural, and if I look at Bing imagery, rocks like Sea Wood Scar actually look like a single rock 150m away from the area that you’ve mapped. Am I looking at the right thing?

Thanks

Please don’t turn every meadow/wood/area into a multipolygon, it makes things a nightmare to edit in future

Reverted as changeset/153735719

I think this is a service road, not a track. It’s regularly used for vehicular access to the YHA and the hut, by cars rather than agricultural vehicles.

Hi, I’ve had to revert these changes (as changeset/153666298) as they muddled all the shop nodes up so that the phone numbers and other tagging no longer matched the addresses or shop details.

If you’re going to update shops (which is appreciated), please leave the house numbers and shop node positions unchanged. Consider using a tool like https://streetcomplete.app/ to help you. Thanks.

Reverted as changeset/153666079 since it deleted so many things without giving a reason.

Why do you keep deleting gates?

This would be better off split into multiple changesets, e.g. one per note, so you can actually document your decision making in the changeset comments.

OSM edits which cover a large geographical area are hard for others to review. See osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets

Thanks

Welcome to OSM. If you’re going to add lots of houses, please use the ‘Q’ key to square up their corners when adding them. It makes drawing regular buildings a lot easier! Ta

Why have you deleted so many gates?

Hiya, what’s the source for the gill names here? I can’t find Cawder Wood Gill/Ghyll or Horse Close Gill/Ghyll in any of the stream name gazetteers.

Hiya. Why have you deleted so many gates? It seems a bit implausible they have all been removed since they were mapped.

Makes sense, thanks for the detail :) I’ve amended the tagging in changeset/153368764, let me know if it looks incorrect

Heya. way/1214769505 is currently tagged as a detached house (because that’s what it looked like to me on aerial imagery + cadastral parcels). Is it actually a terrace, or an apartment building? Ta

Heya, just as a quick suggestion, in case you’ve not come across it before: when out surveying shops, you might want to try using https://streetcomplete.app/, it makes it easy to update shop details. Only works on Android, not iPhone, though.

Thanks! I see the description has been updated for https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48118, and it’s much more informative. 👌

However, the description for https://maproulette.org/browse/projects/56391, https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48135, https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/48237, etc. all still need to be updated similarly.

Hiya, looking at https://mpr.lt/c/48118/t/229418909, the description for the challenge is just “challenges description” repeated several times. That’s not very helpful to anyone.

Is there a description somewhere of what objectives you’re trying to achieve, and how the challenge tasks have been generated?

Thanks

Heya. It looks like post box CA13 89 is already mapped at node/3370196453. I assume you only just surveyed it as being on Fern Bank, so that suggests it’s been physically moved from Sullart Street at some point, or the original mapping was wrong.

If you could, it would be handy to survey the old location on Sullart Street and see what’s going on there.

If that’s not something you have time for, that’s fine; I can leave a note on the old location so someone else can check it out eventually.

There’s a map of postboxes here: https://osm.mathmos.net/postboxes/progress/CA/CA13/#11/54.6147/-3.3296

Hope you have a good day :)

Great, thanks. If you could please update people on changeset/152889219 with what you get back from the local ranger, that would be lovely.

Heya, what was the motivation for this edit? I would have thought it would make a bit more sense to have the river ways connected in the lake, so they’re connected for routing/navigation and plotting of catchment areas (e.g. for https://waterwaymap.org/#map=11.69/54.5246/-3.3715). But I can also see that it’s a bit weird to have a river flowing through the middle of a lake, especially when it changes name part-way across. I’m wondering if you’d found some official guidance about this kind of situation? Ta