I’ve fixed it in changeset changeset/87072791. I think the issue is that you did accidentally make some changes to the bridleway, marking it as access=private on the service road. I added access exceptions for pedestrians, horses and bikes. Thanks for your replies on this!

Hi, this edit doesn’t quite look right. What were you trying to achieve? Adding Italian names to buildings in Barrow doesn’t really make sense; and the unit number was already set for Bailey's cafe. I’ve reverted these changes in changeset/87014556. Thanks.

Which available resources in particular? Can you point me to the roadside imagery you used? Or the feedback from the driver?

I don’t know if you’re wrong for sure – I haven’t been down Hayclose Lane recently – but it seems pretty implausible for the bridleway to be inaccessible at one end.

Thanks.

Hi, are you sure about this change? This leaves the bridleway inaccessible from Hayclose Lane, which seems unlikely. Has it been rerouted? What’s your source?

Hi, welcome and thanks for your edits. Did you know that you can press the ‘Q’ button when a building is selected to automatically square its corners and hence to fit the satellite imagery better? Happy editing :)

This site is a nuclear power station. Please tag any new roads you add in it as access=private.

Hi, I’ve deleted this track in changeset changeset/85544686 because it’s just a temporary track for a new pipeline being built. I’ve added the full pipeline now, so it should be clear which tracks are temporary near it in future. Cheers.

Hi, thanks for your edits! Please consider using the ‘Q’ key in the ID editor to square up the corners of buildings. Just select the building and press ‘Q’. It makes the map neater and (generally, apart from old buildings) more correct. Ta :)

Nope, it's definitely a car parking area, not a highway. I have surveyed it. Can you please revert this?

Nice one!

It was found on a list of allotments in Kendal (https://www.kendaltowncouncil.gov.uk/sites/), all of the rest of which exist. Neither lakedistrict (who added it) or myself had local knowledge of exactly where it is, but it presumably does exist, and is worth leaving a fixme note in place for, so that someone can survey for it in future.

I can't survey it any time soon for obvious coronavirus reasons.

Hi, and thanks for your contributions! Are you aware that you can press ‘Q’ in the editor, when a building or area is selected, to automatically square up its corners? It makes drawing square buildings a lot easier.

Why? Does it not exist? Do you know where it does exist? Adding a comment to your changesets would help others to know what your reasoning for changes is. Thanks.

Why? There’s no give way from Lound Road to the east, and I don’t remember there being any road name signs to contradict the bridge being a continuation of Lound Road.

Hi, thanks for your edits. There’s no need to label these paths as being on the Dales Way, as they’re already in the Dales Way relation (relation/29302). I’ve removed the names in changeset/82392488 (but kept the surface tags you added, thanks).

Nice work!

The PTv2 documentation for public_transport=station says that stations should be mapped as areas unless the outline is not known (public_transport=station).

I don’t disagree with you, but I think there is a reduction of information by tagging the station outline as a railway corridor rather than something more specific.

In any case, would you consider updating the wiki? Having the wiki document one thing while people are actively changing away from that is going to lead to confusion and duplicated work as people continue to map to the old schema.

I am local. Platforms 1 and 2 are operational; platform 6 (the eastmost platform, which is already tagged as disused) is not.service=*#Railways seems to suggest that service=siding is correct for those tracks, but I don’t really know (or care!). If you’re sure the tagging is wrong please do change it. :-)

The station/cafe building is a private business now, and has different opening times from the train station. The north-west end of the platforms are fenced off and seem to belong to the cafe (although it wasn’t open when I was there).

Unless I have misunderstood, changing Lancaster from an area to a node is not what the tagging wiki says for railway stations (railway=station#A_Simple_Railway_Station). What's the goal here?

That makes sense. Looking into it more closely, it seems the OSL dataset was withdrawn in 2015, so the OSLMC tool is never going to be useful again until it’s updated to use the replacement OS Open Names dataset, and that’s too much of a change for me to tackle. :(

osm.wiki/OS_Locator#Discontinued