OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
65556208 about 7 years ago

Hi, thanks for contributing to OSM! Do you know if Brew has replaced the deli at 18a Brock St?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65556208

65547864 about 7 years ago

Please at least add the HE_ref tags so the heritage sites can link to the canonical source of English heritage data, rather than redirecting through wikidata.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65547864

65542514 about 7 years ago

Tweaked in changeset/65544904. I hope that’s OK. Thanks for your work on everything!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65542514

65542514 about 7 years ago

I think it should be at level=0, since it’s at ground level. level=-1 is underground. I’ll fix it up.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65542514

65509797 about 7 years ago

And here: listed_status=*
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65509797

65509797 about 7 years ago

The wiki gives a few more tags which should be used for indicating listed status: osm.wiki/Tag:heritage:operator=, HE_ref= and osm.wiki/Tag:listed_status=. See here: changeset/65528977
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65509797

65507177 about 7 years ago

Delete what? Why?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65507177

65507273 about 7 years ago

Note that instead of deleting closed shops/banks, you could (for example) change from shop=beauty to disused:shop=beauty, delete the business-specific tags like the website, but keep the address. That way the postcode and building number information doesn’t get lost. See osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix for details.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65507273

65417623 about 7 years ago

I realise that (I am a cyclist). It still seems redundant to add bicycle=yes to roads when the default legal status is for bikes to be allowed on roads. Similarly, the default legal status for motorways is for bikes to not be allowed, so tagging them with bicycle=no seems redundant.

Where has all this data come from?

65417623 about 7 years ago

You’ve put bicycle=yes on the Caton Road interchange even though there are cycle paths explicitly mapped separately from the roadway. Why?

Where has all this data come from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65417623

65317069 about 7 years ago

(Source is presumably: https://www.grough.co.uk/magazine/2018/08/09/england-has-a-new-mountain-miller-moss-now-go-find-it)
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65317069

65308878 about 7 years ago

If you know these are definitely all terraced houses, you could use building=terrace to leave a bit more information in the map.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65308878

65294984 about 7 years ago

Hi, this shop appears to already exist in the building just to the north. Have they expanded, or is this a duplicate?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65294984

65241373 about 7 years ago

Wow, where’d you get all this data from?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65241373

65061876 about 7 years ago

Nice work. :-)

65019765 about 7 years ago

No worries, thanks for your edits and responsiveness! I would interpret that tutorial as meaning you shouldn’t keep the editor open for days, working on unrelated changes all over the map. :-)

65016794 about 7 years ago

Yup, I think that’s all OK. Seems to fit in with the tagging guidelines: osm.wiki/UK_access_provisions#Public_bridleways

65030319 about 7 years ago

(Note: This changeset only changed the designation of the existing mapped path. Having been here myself many times, the path definitely exists on the ground, and existed in OSM prior to this edit.)

65030319 about 7 years ago

Are you copying data from an OS walking map? For tedious licensing reasons, that’s not allowed (see osm.wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata for the list of OS data we *are* allowed to use in OpenStreetMap). If you copy data from OS walking maps, you risk all your edits being reverted in order to keep OSM’s licensing correct.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65030319

65030650 about 7 years ago

As far as I’m aware, foot/bicycle/horse=designated implies access=yes, but also means that that’s the intended user of the track. Why change this, out of interest?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/65030650