I’ve been putting the farm names on the farmhouse, as the house name. It seems a bit redundant to put them on the farmyard area too, but I could do.

Sure, highway=service (maybe also service=driveway?) also looks appropriate from my POV.

Would highway=unclassified be better than highway=residential for those roads? They look like back-country roads from the satellite imagery to me.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64489670

Hi. Instead of adding one building per changeset, can you please add multiple related buildings in a single changeset? It makes the changes easier to review. Thanks.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64475659

Good question, I’ll need to go and take a look at Kershaw Drive. Seems a bit odd that half of the loop is classed as private.

Note that if you’re using the ID editor, you can press ‘s’ when a building is selected, to automatically square its sides and corners.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64259059

Hey, it would be great if you could fill in the osm.wiki/Tag:sidewalk=, lit= and lanes= tags while you’re surveying this stuff!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/64257151

Nice. It’s also useful to add the FHRS (Food Hygiene) ID to takeaways and other food places, which lets us check the address. See https://gregrs.dev.openstreetmap.org/fhrs/district-13.html. For Foo Wing, the FHRS data is at http://ratings.food.gov.uk/business/en-GB/267603/, and it says it’s at number 15, not number 13. What’s the correct building number?

I added the FHRS ID and tweaked the phone number formatting in changeset/63982559, but have not touched the building number.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63978290

I tweaked it in changeset/63982559
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63979347

The more conventional tag name for this would be alt_name, rather than name_1: alt_name=*
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/63979347

Thanks for adding these to Maryport. Note that if you press ‘s’ while an area is selected, the editor will automatically square the corners for you, which makes drawing buildings easier. I’ve done that in changeset changeset/63960274.

Hi, thanks for your edit. There was a slight problem in that you tagged the entire footpath as a bridge, rather than just the span of the bridge. I’ve fixed that in changeset/63773447 — take a look if you want!

Fixed it: changeset/63434059

I don’t think that’s right. The offices at the north end of the building are 2 storeys, but the offices in the middle and the workshops at the south end are 1 (tall) storey. I think the building needs splitting into a multipolygon.

How many racks, and what kind of rack, are in the bicycle parking in Sedbergh?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61620606

If you’ve verified those bus stops exist on the ground, you could change naptan:verified to yes, and add bench=yes/no and shelter=yes/no.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61442681

Can you remember whether the car park is lit? That would be useful information to add.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/61316147

Thanks for the changes! A couple of small comments:
- Looks like you’ve set the address for 11 Lythe Fell Avenue both on the building area (correct) and on one of its corner nodes (incorrect).
- building=yes is very generic — it would be better to use building=house for all of these (assuming they are all houses). See the documentation on the wiki: building=house

building:levels=0 on the Holland & Barrett and Santander??

OK, I’ve re-added the buildings and the bus stops in changeset #59845678.

I’ve changed the tagging on the buildings (so they won’t show up as a bank and police station again). The bank is now marked as disused, and the police station is now marked as a generic residential building.

Thanks for your work so far! :-)