gurglypipe's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 162247747 | 11 months ago | It’s been a few months since I was last there, but doesn’t that service road run under the bridge, and the cycle lane is on top of the bridge? If so, they shouldn’t be connected. |
| 162243196 | 11 months ago | Reverted (as changeset/162244615) for the same reasons as in changeset/162242922 — see discussion there |
| 162242922 | 11 months ago | Hiya, thanks for your edits around the Dales recently. I’ve reverted this change because the access tagging for this bridleway was already correct, and your changes broke vehicle access to Gunnerfleet Farm. Bridleways are a right of way, and don’t necessarily describe the physical appearance of the route. The tagging to indicate a bridleway is designation=public_bridleway horse=designated. In this case, the physical appearance of the way is as a compacted gravel track, with private vehicular access to the farm. highway=bridleway is a bit of a distraction and generally only makes sense to use when going across fields, with no vehicular access (a bit like highway=footway is used). See osm.wiki/Access_provisions_in_the_United_Kingdom#Public_bridleways for more information on tagging them. Thanks! Happy to answer any questions if you have them. Reverted as changeset/162244290 |
| 162228941 | 11 months ago | This edit covers most of the length of the UK, and is therefore quite hard for other editors to review. Please make your edits smaller in future, thanks: osm.wiki/Changeset#Geographical_size_of_changesets |
| 162136038 | 11 months ago | 👍 |
| 162136038 | 11 months ago | Heya, you’ve changed the name of node/11288138877 quite significantly, from ‘Great Slack’ to ‘Seathwaite Fell South Top’. Are you sure this is correct? Great Slack is shown on the OS maps and should be mapped as some kind of feature in the area (even if it’s not the name of the summit). As I understand it, the names on DoBIH are not necessarily historically researched, and are often constructed by whoever listed the hill. They’re not particularly canonical. |
| 162066163 | 11 months ago | A nice improvement, good work :D |
| 161613668 | 11 months ago | Thanks |
| 161649898 | 11 months ago | Thanks |
| 161650516 | 11 months ago | There is no prominence distinction between natural=peak and natural=hill, but natural=hill does no harm here so I’ve changed it in changeset/161701761 |
| 161649321 | 11 months ago | Heya, should Hartrigg be a hamlet (node/12523533576)? It’s the farm there, so I’m not sure it’s correct for it also to be a hamlet. |
| 161649898 | 11 months ago | Why change Badger Rock (way/507498775) from natural=boulder to natural=bare_rock? It’s a single boulder, so I suggest natural=stone would be the most appropriate tag (see natural=stone). |
| 161613668 | 11 months ago | Hiya, I’m not sure this change does what you intended: the note on the way says “pass is open to vehicles and horses with permits for one day per month.”. You removed the access=permit tagging (which sets the default access for all modes) and added motor_vehicle=permit, but didn’t add horse=permit. So now the horse access tagging is unspecified. I think setting the default using access=permit was a bit more robust than specifying the same for each mode of transport. |
| 161650516 | 11 months ago | Why change Hall Hill from natural=peak to place=locality? It’s a small hill: https://www.geograph.org.uk/photo/7454714 |
| 161580782 | 12 months ago | Hiya, thanks for these updates to Kentmere! When editing, please remember to keep the history (osm.wiki/Keep_the_history), so rather than deleting and re-drawing Kentmere Tarn, it would have been better to modify the existing area. This preserves the record of other people’s contributions to the area. I’ve restored the history while keeping your updated geometry in changeset/161582135, but it was quite a complex process. Let me know if anything in that changeset doesn’t look right. |
| 161496590 | 12 months ago | I’ve re-added and re-tagged them in changeset/161568957 |
| 161496590 | 12 months ago | Hiya, instead of deleting the areas for the cut forests south of Cowgill, it would have been better to change their tagging to man_made=clearcut (man_made=clearcut). That renders them as clearcut on the map (which is useful for navigation when walking) and avoids losing the history of other people’s contributions to that bit of the map. |
| 161284433 | 12 months ago | Fun times 🙃 |
| 161284433 | 12 months ago | Thanks, that was in Middlesbrough right? There seem to be some changes in Swansea too, meaning this changeset spans most of England |
| 161284433 | 12 months ago | What change were you making here? There’s no changeset comment. :) |