Hi Pablo,
this changeset has destroyed at least the boundary relations for Morelos, Puebla, Atzitzihuacán, Cohuecan and Zacualpan. Even as your comment just states the opposite:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-98.60492&lat=19.08863&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi fgp789,
this changeset has destroyed the relations for Bello Horizonte 1, Anexo Bello Horizonte and Maestro Gabriel:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.23474&lat=12.14615&zoom=17

Can you please fix this?
Kidn Regards
Guido

Hi fgp789,
this changeset has destroyed the relations for Distrito II, Distrito III and Daniel Chavarria:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-86.30015&lat=12.10506&zoom=13

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi mariotomo,
there are hundreds of errors in this region but the relations seem to be OK. I have fixed some of the countles errors, but wich error are you refering to?
Guido

Hi darioriobo,
this error still exits, can I get a response here?
Guido

HI erickdeoliveiraleal, thanks for your fast response. The views in OSMI are updated daily or at least several times a week. So you can check again today if your task is complete.
Guido

Hi Geomir,
this changeset has created a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding duplicate and overlapping houses. Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding unconnected ways. As you probably know, those can not be used by routing software:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.26185&lat=-12.81733&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding unconnected ways. As you probably know, those can not be used by routing software:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.26185&lat=-12.81733&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding unconnected ways. As you probably know, those can not be used by routing software:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.26185&lat=-12.81733&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi erickdeoliveiraleal,
your recent changesets have added several errors to the OSM database regarding unconnected ways. As you probably know, those can not be used by routing software:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.26185&lat=-12.81733&zoom=9

Can you please fix this?
Kind Regards
Guido

Hi Valdiele,
this error still exits. Can i get a response here?
Guido

Hi Land-o Calrissian,
this error still exists. Can I get a feedback here?
Guido

Hi mariotomo,
thanks for your request. The errors were wrongly used relations. Those are not collections.

You can defintively help avoiding and removing those kind of errors or even better errors of all kinds by using quality assurance tools on a regular base:

osm.wiki/Quality_assurance

I personally use OSM Inspector (http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/) with following views more or less daily to review south and central america:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=-64.29492&lat=2.10231&zoom=4&overlays=self_intersection_ways,self_intersection_points,single_node_in_way,duplicate_node_in_way

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-79.42859&lat=7.82964&zoom=8

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-80.26355&lat=8.63425&zoom=8

Thanks a lot for your engagement if you like to join me.
Guido

Hi Pedro,
your recent changesets have created several dozens of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.08419&lat=-22.51533&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Regarding cycleways close to streets there is a different set of rules about how to map them properly:

cycleway=*

Can you please check if these rules apply to your case?
Guido

Hi Pedro,
your recent changesets have created several dozens of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.08419&lat=-22.51533&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Regarding cycleways close to streets there is a different set of rules about how to map them properly:

cycleway=*

Can you please check if these rules apply to your case?
Guido

Hi Pedro,
your recent changesets have created several dozens of errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-44.08419&lat=-22.51533&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Regarding cycleways close to streets there is a different set of rules about how to map them properly:

cycleway=*

Can you please check if these rules apply to your case?
Guido

Hi Land-o Calrissian,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.22690&lat=4.56941&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Guido

Hi mcnabbian,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-74.22690&lat=4.56941&zoom=14&overlays=duplicated_edges

Can you please fix this?

Guido

Hi Valdiele,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding overlapping ways:

http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-63.89395&lat=-8.72969&zoom=13&overlays=duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges,duplicated_edges_areas,snap_points,unconnected_open_ends_1,unconnected_open_ends_2,unconnected_open_ends_3,unconnected_open_ends_4,unconnected_open_ends_5,unconnected_open_ends_6

Can you please fix this?

Regarding the mapping of cycleways which are very close to streets there are different rules to consider:

cycleway=*

Can you please check if they apply to your case?
Guido