It was _not_ an old scool multipolygon...

Then why didn't you do as you suggested yourself? Now there is no rendering of the outer perimeter of the aerodrome...

Sensible? I disagree.

There were two aerodrome objects:
* A multipolygon with several correct tags and outline of the aerodrome.
* A node with fewer tags than the MP.

They both represent the same object but are not exact duplicates. The MP had significantly more information in it.
Then someone delete _all_ of the tags on the multipolygon? I don't call that sensible.

With that edit, the rendering of the aerodrome outline disappeared, f.ex.

Also: The edit you refer to was done by a editor with only a handful of edits at the time.

Also: Your changeset comment is misleading. Deleting an untagged MP is not the same as "fixing old-style multipolygons"

I see. It was that edit was in the wrong. Don't know if you looked into this before you deleted the relation? Reverted.

reverted

The nightmare is certainly you deleting information from the more complete relation. If only you had copied the tags from the aerodrome node...
Sometimes duplicate information is accepted. The world is not black and white. :/

What was wrong this multipolygon? Did it warrant outright deleting it?

Hei. Ser at en rundkjøring (way/645963847/history) ble tagget som oneway=yes i heller enn junction=roundabout. Kanskje dette var noe som kom fra nvdb via et script el.l?

Also added some flares to roundabouts.

ADDRESS var brukt 88 ganger før dette og 125 ganger i dette changesettet.

Flott med import, men kanskje normalisere adressetaggene litt?
ADDRESS=PLOGFABRIKKVEGEN 2, 4353 KLEPP STASJON
Er ikke osm.wiki/Proposed_features/House_numbers/Karlsruhe_Schema bedre?

Det er nok bare en 'søndags-filial' til Extra Øksnevad som ligger i samme bygg. Inngang i hver sin ende av bygget. Bygget er ganske nytt og ble bygget for Coop, så det ville overraske om de allerede er rebrandet.
Men kan ta en sving innom en dag og dobbeltsjekke.

Veldig bra kommentert! Da er det lett å forstå hva du tenkte og kan få konstruktiv tilbakemelding.

Hei J :)
Så lenge det er mulig å kjøre eller gå igjennom, er det best å beholde den gjennomgående veien. Det holder med barrier=block på noden.
traffic_calming er det ikke nødvendig å ha på ways, hvis de enkelte humpene er tagget på noder.
Den søndre delen av Granveien har mistet sin highway=* tag? Og hva mener du med direction=both?

Better now?

Svantebroen har jeg ikke hørt om før. Hva er det?

Hvorfor? Hvis jeg husker rett står er det "innkjøring forbudt for motorkjøretøy" og "gjelder ikke buss i rute".
Dette er _ikke_ en boliggate og det er få eller ingen oppkjørsler til bolighus fra denne bussveien.

Yes. The road is open. construction=trunk is wrong.
Thanks to Thyregod for fixing this a few days ago.

But please note that this is an issue with OSRM. The routing engine shoult should not take the construction=* tag into consideration when highway!=construction.

Also note that the tag in question was not introduced in this changeset. It has been with this way since version 1, over a year ago.

Har gjenbrukt nodene og wayen og tegnet huset som står der i stedet.

Hi
Seems like you have added higway="incline (1)" to a number of nodes in this area.
As nodes does not have a direction, putting an incline does not make much sense. It's much better to put incline=up/down on the way itself.

You can find them here: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/sZB

best regards