somehow potlatch writes the random v1 out of a changeset with mangled common keys...
muse aloud how faceb00c added the additional tag of mysterious meaning.
now how did fakebook get iD to perform a potlatch and change the source key? must be contagious
make a logical tagging of the potlatch repeat-tags
restore the potlatch-edited-away source tag
segments sliced from the adjoining bit while it bore the wrongly-changed tag
ref got turned into `b' in a potlatch edit
you know source makes more sense
potlatch edit had turned source into `b'
lose the typo where the correct access is set
the `a' was missing so it went nowhere
delete the typo that went nowhere
delete the unexpanded typo, the correct one is present
repair another typo that did not get expanded